The IPC is in contravention of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The right to one's property is UNQUESTIONABLE according to the TRUE global authority… the UN, but a corrupt and immoral venture like the EU has no legal basis on international justice and should’ve NEVER had any say on this matter!
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty
Article 17.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
The case of… Chafiq Ayadi v Council of the European Union leaves no question as to who is the supreme authority of international justice…
Case T 253/02: Chafiq Ayadi v Council of the European Union
4. From the standpoint of international law, the obligations of the Member States of the United Nations under the Charter of the United Nations clearly prevail over every other obligation of domestic law or of international treaty law including, for those of them that are members of the Council of Europe, their obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and, for those that are also members of the Community, their obligations under the EC Treaty. That primacy extends to decisions contained in a resolution of the Security Council, in accordance with Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Although not a member of the United Nations, the Community must be considered to be bound by the obligations under the Charter of the United Nations in the same way as its Member States, by virtue of the Treaty establishing it. First, the Community may not infringe the obligations imposed on its Member States by the Charter of the United Nations or impede their performance. Second, in the exercise of its powers it is bound, by the very Treaty by which it was established, to adopt all the measures necessary to enable its Member States to fulfil those obligations.
(see para. 116)
5. In light of the principle of the primacy of the law of the United Nations over Community law, the claim that the Court of First Instance has jurisdiction to review indirectly the lawfulness of decisions of the Security Council or of the Sanctions Committee according to the standard of protection of fundamental rights as recognised by the Community legal order cannot be justified either on the basis of international law or on the basis of Community law.
The resolutions of the Security Council adopted under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations therefore fall, in principle, outside the ambit of the Court’s judicial review and the Court has no authority to call in question, even indirectly, their lawfulness in the light of Community law. On the contrary, the Court is bound, so far as possible, to interpret and apply that law in a manner compatible with the obligations of the Member States under the Charter of the United Nations.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex ... 53:EN:HTML
Cyprus should exit the corrupt and immoral EU and pursue justice via Articles 39 to 51 of the UN Charter…
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml
