Bananiot wrote:I think you do not have a clue paphitis, sorry. You make, it seems, a quick internet search and you come up with the best that fits your stereotypical view of the world.
Aviation is my life Bananiot. This is all I ever new from the age of 17, and was fortunate enough to receive the best training available.
Naturally, military and aviation history interest me deeply. There is no other job I am capable of doing, apart from fly. I have been blessed to have the best occupation in the world as far as I'm concerned.
The
PZL P.24, the main Greek fighter in the Greco-Italian War (1940, WWII).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o ... _Air_ForceHere is a picture of the PZL P.24:
The PZL P24 was a Polish fighter that first flew in 1933. It was absolutely no match for the Italian Air Force or the Luftwaffe and was considered obsolete by 1940 when up against the German War Machine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_P.24In this case you came up with the spitfires but you gave up quickly. I am sure you can find the official site of the Greek Air Force that will shed ample light on the planes purchased just prior to the Italian attack. You may also encounter another fact. The size of the Greek army that faced the Italians was bigger, especially after mobilisation.
Why don't you post some evidence of the aircraft purchased by Greece?
Be my guest Bananiot, and then I will explain why these
PZL P24 aircraft were inferior to anything the Italians had.
The size of the military force itself does not guarantee any military success Bananiot. Throughout history, much larger armies have been defeated in battle by 'inferior' forces. Even the US has been defeated many times and that is with all the sophistication it possess within its arsenal.
An army will fight valiantly as long as it has a very good
reason to fight, and is led by good officers that inspire and motivate their men. In Vietnam, the average American soldier did not have as much reason to fight as the Vietnamese did, and this is why the US was made to heel over time. It was a war of attrition.
Of course, you would rather believe that the Greeks won that contest, besides being fewer and ill equipped, fighting against all odds etc, etc, relying solely on courage and Greek "leventia" but these are football terms used by morons and I have no time for them.
I don't believe in leventia Bananiot. All soldiers, no matter what their origins begin as normal
innocent people before they become soldiers. They are initially young boys who could not hurt a fly, let alone kill another man. It is the training that turns these young boys into fighting men. And it is the training that turns them into a 'superior' fighting force, along with their units
leadership and
discipline. Their equipment also plays an important role, because their equipment can determine their effectiveness as a fighting force, but this is by no means is the determining factor. If they have a
reason to fight, then they will be determined to do so, no matter what.
Throughout history, there are numerous examples of amazing military victories from many nations. The Greeks defeating the Italians in 1940 is just one example of many, and this amazing victory is well documented and acknowledged by many nations and their former leaders. It is only you who plays this down, whereas, even the Russians, Americans, Australians, Germans and Italians acknowledge Greece's victory as quite a
remarkable and
surprising accomplishment.