with personal opinions : no problem simos
its just this specific personal opinion causes fears to our tcs compatriots. such opinion can be easily misinterprated. thats why i am kind of hard on you
The reason I say this is that I simply believe that Cyprus got left behind when the Greek islands were liberated. When Crete, Rhodes etc etc were finally annexed to Greece, Cyprus wanted the same but were denied by the British
.
firstly as i posted on the eoka thread, at some point we had the offer of self-determination but we that is makarios and the wise grivas rejected it.
second later despite the fact that we (the gc and never the tc) wanted we didnot get it. end of that story. we move forward. future not past, how can i explain it to you.
third, the last attempt to bring enosis brought the amazing result of dividing our country and causing a lot of pain. no union and thousand of refugees.
The fact is I do not know whether Greece or Cyprus want to unite
re simon, we had a military agreement and greece has said that it is not that possible anymore.
However, I understand this is extremely unlikely given Turkey's involvement in Cyprus
its not just turkeys involvement. its the whole worlds involvement. what makes you think that the UN or the EU will accept that. the security council resolutions talk about a BBF. and they are binding. therefore enosis is between ither things illegal.
For a start, Cyprus wouldn't be so vulnerable from foreign occupiers, by joining a larger country
do you believe we are in danger of yet another invation?
I also believe Cyprus would get more foreign investment, and more money for infastructure etc from Greece.
check the unemplyment rates in greece and cyprus.
compare the two economies. greece has been for years receiving help from the EU. we are already out from the big banch of money.
Cyprus could still be autonomous with its own Parliament etc wthin the state of Greece.
so you want an autonomy in joining greece?
like which other greek island?
or are we a special case?
what do you think about giving the tc autonomy in the RoC?
However, it is not really about benefits, it is about a moral right for the majority to choose their destiny.
first get the majority for enosis and then we discuss it again
I have said that I would be willing to drop these hopes, if TCs ended their ridiculous claim of 50/50 power share. You see, they want us to make all the concessions, while they just demand more and more.
if it is a tactical method, that is since they ask more i ll ask for even more, i am afraid that i still disagree with you. the tc dont demand a 50/50 share. they have it since 1960. and enosis is out of the question since 1960. its all th eother things we have to agree upon.
It doesn't matter what year we have this conversation in, foreign occupation still exists in 2006, that's what you should be worrying yourself with
and by reffering to enosis is a way of solving that ?