denizaksulu wrote:Piratis wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Piratis wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Piratis wrote:Bananiot wrote:Shut up Lit, quick to draw conclusions from the writings of a couple of forumers. Only a moron does this. The Cyprus issue is more serious than you can ever imagine.
Piratis, let us get to the truth. The TMT wanted to incite hatred but they could only achieve this if they found a willing partner. Our nationalist duly obliged by targeting the ordinary, vulnerable Turkish Cypriots who worked with Greek Cypriots. They worked hand in hand with TMT to destroy this country. Simply we lost out and we are crying our hearts out now. Had we been the successful part we would hear the other side weep, from Anatolia.
Now Piratis, tell us how these Kondemenos people murdered by TMT, were defending their houses in Kondemenos. The riots were taking place in Nicosia, the murdered people were far away from their houses they were supposed to defend. Please clarify.
First of all those 8 people, the first massacre, where not murdered by TMT. It seems you didn't read the links I provided:Mr. K. Robinson asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies how many Greek Cypriots have been killed in Cyprus in the course of communal rioting since the beginning of May; and how many are thought to have been murdered by Turkish-Cypriot terrorists.
Mr. Profumo: The Answer to the first part of the Question is "twelve" and to the second part "none".
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/comm ... 24_HOC_223
The above is from the 24th of June. It includes the 8 GCs that were massacred on the 12th of june and 4 more that were murdered during the riots since the 7th of June. As you can see from the report those people were not murdered by TMT. TMT just planted the bomb at the Turkish Information Office to give the signal for the riots.
The murders of 1958 were not carried out by TMT but by regular TCs. The TC population was incited to act in this murderous way by broadcasts and newspaper articles from Turkey.
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/comm ... 617_HOC_12
Similarly, those who reacted to the Turkish aggression those days were the regular GCs who saw their homes and shops being burned down and their lives threatened, without the British police being able (or willing) to protect them.
When the TCs were so easily manipulated and they didn't see the wrong in burning down the shops and homes of innocent people, do you really expect from GCs to be so smart to figure out the whole plan of Turkey and not to react to the destruction of their properties? Both GCs and TCs were in their majority uneducated farmers, don't you think you are asking for too much from them?
It is more than clear that the inter-communal conflict was planned in Turkey as part of their partition plan. Our side had absolutely nothing to gain from a conflict with the Turkish or any other minority.
The Turkish/British plan for the inter-communal conflict was simple: Inside the simpleton TCs to murder and destruction of GC properties by brainwashing them with broadcasts from Turkey, the British police would do very little to stop the rioting and protect the GCs, the GCs would try to protect themselves and possibly retaliate, and soon the inter-communal conflict would be achieved.
You have such a sick mind. These 'murdered' people were not on a picnic when arreseted. As far as the Turkish Cypriot villagers were concerned they were intent on attacking TC villages as reported in your link.
That they were arrested and then set 'free' is another story. The Brits could not even organise a chimpanzees tea party without falling over themselves. You know the truth ful intent of these people who were killed yet you are in denial. Dickhead.!!
Hey asshole, the attacks were initiated by the TCs on the 7th of June. How about if we killed each and every TC that took part in those riots or even dared to hold some stick in the range of 10 miles around our properties? Would that be fair punishment for those TCs? In the video I posted you can see TCs attacking GC properties. Is the death penalty the right punishment for those shown on that video?
But GCs did not react in this way. Their response was in fact very mild in comparison to the TC aggression. But then you choose to escalate the conflict and you committed the first massacre of the inter-communal conflict.
You support and excuse the murder of innocent people and that is what is sick my friend.
I dont support any murders whateever reason you sick bastard. Where do you think this argument will get you you arse hole.
You had a right to self determination , fine, we had the right to survive as Turkish Cypriot on the island of our for bearers you arsehole. Get used to it and dont bring such useless arguments up again you arsehole.
NOW FUCK OFF. (sorry Oracle)
You excused the murders of those people in your previous post. It would be better to admit you were wrong instead of trying to deny a fact which is recorded in your post.
Nobody threatened your survival in Cyprus. In the 50s we had nothing against your minority or any other minority in Cyprus. You became the enemy only after you collaborated with the Colonialists and you attacked us.
Furthermore, how is your survival in Cyprus related with burning the shops and homes of GCs and massacring innocents???
That was a natural reaction against your Enosis dreams you thick head. Other islands may have taken their own Enosis lying down but not the TCs . They did not want Enosis, you did. You should have been content to live in peace, but no. Enosis drove you crazy.
Union with Greece was a 100% legitimate demand of the Cypriot people, not any less legitimate than independence. This is why the resolution for de-colonization defines " free association with an independent State, integration into an independent State, or independence as the three legitimate options of full self-government. "
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpi/decolonizat ... ration.htm
Your minority was not attacked and was not threatened (until you attacked us). Even if union with Greece was achieved we would continue to live together in Cyprus just like we did during Ottoman and British rule. How could it be fine for Cyprus to be part of the Ottoman or British empires against the will of the Cypriot people, but not OK for Cyprus to be part of the Greek Republic which is what the vast majority of Cypriots wanted?
Nobody asked from you to support union with Greece if you didn't agree with it. But disagreeing with a legitimate option that the majority choose doesn't give you the right to burn down homes and shops and murder innocent people, right? It is these actions of yours which initiated the inter-communal conflict. If you had accepted that Cypriots could democratically and peacefully decide the destiny of their own island then nobody would need to die in any conflict.
(note that your community did not support any of the legitimate options. On the contrary you supported partition, something which involves the ethnic cleansing and human rights violations of 100s of thousands of Cypriots)