The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Do you trust that Millett his telling the truth? I don't ..

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:53 pm

Birkibrisli wrote:Welcome back,Viewpoint!!!
According to my logic,if you couldn't stay away from the forum that proved you were an individual,albeit an addict to Cyprus-Forum... :)
I can only hope my logic was correct! :wink:
Personally i have nothing against Viewpoint ,the individual.
If we all agreed on everything there would be no need for forums like this.


Thanks for the welcome back, why do I feel its insincere and cold?

You are right it does get addictive for all of us, and I believe we are all here to test our beliefs and understand others opinions, so those who resort to personal attacks and defamation of character should be judged according and their posts should always be assessed with apprehension and suspicion don't you think?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:58 pm

Piratis
The conclusion is that Turkey along with TCs are illegally occupying 1/3rd of Cyprus. End the occupation get your rights back, give us our rights and lands back, and then we talk if and what changes can be made. We are not going to discuss anything while you illegally keep hostage 1/3rd of our country and you are trying to blackmail us to accept things that you have no right for.


OK by us, but don't think we will wait for you to see the the light or the other side of the story we will pursue our own agenda but if at anytime you are pissed off by waiting for that swing let us know.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby BirKibrisli » Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:02 pm

The posts by Piratis and Murataga highlight perfectly why it is proving so difficult to solve Cypro...

Both are right from their point of view.TC are/were numerically much less than GCs,hence technically they are a minority in Cyprus,as Piratis suggests.Hovever the 1960 agreement gave them powers far above their numerical strength,including the right to Veto,which made them equal partners in the RoC,as Murataga asserts.

If these opposing views are held without wavering or compromising,as it has been the case so far since 1963,there cannot be a solution which will be acceptable to both sides.If there is no agreement,status quo will remain for the foreseeable future,and when international balance of power changes,there will be another hot conflict which will result one or both of the Cypriot communities extinction.To my mind it is far more intelligent for both sides to give a bit from their entrenched positions,so that both communties can survive and prosper in their homeland...
The alternative is unthinkable,but very real and very possible.
It is upto us to save our Cyprus for her people to enjoy,or make it hell-in-the-making for others to enjoy...I know which I would choose.What about you?
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Piratis » Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:16 pm

Birkibrisli, don't you think we have made enough compromises already by accepting, as you said, that the TC minority can have more powers than minorities usually have?

Also, if TCs were given a president as well then it would be equal partner, but they were given the VICE president. True the TCs were given much more than what proportionately belongs to them (and accepting that was a huge compromise from our side) but at no point they were equated to the 82% majority as such thing would be totally undemocratic.

So it seems to me the compromises are only asked from our side, with TCs wanting to gain on our loss.

As I said above the TCs are welcomed to take the "founding fathers" and the "partnerships" and everything as it was agreed in 1960 agreements. To gain even more on our loss by enforcing illegalities and trying to blackmail us to accept their outrageous demands is not acceptable and I consider it a hostile move that can only be countered by similar measures.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Murataga » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:31 pm

o.k. we clearly have a lack of communication here… According to the 1959 Agreements, the partners of the executive branch were TCs and GCs. This ascended the status of the TCs from being the minority and made them one of the two co-founding parties of Cyprus. Armenian Cypriots, Maronite Cypriots, Jewish Cypriots, Russian Cypriots are minorities. TCs are founding partners and govern the state with the other partner GCs. Lesser population does not necessarily imply minority status; and it certainly does not in the unique circumstances of the Cyprus conflict and history. Yes, the president was GC, and we agreed to this and actually abided by the agreements. Until GCs started enforcing political and violent illegalities to neutralize the partnership status of TCs in their "holy crusade for ENOSIS" and reduce them to a minority status by abusing their executive status in the government. TCs were muscled out of the government when they refused to give up their partnership rights in the Agreements, TCs were murdered in cold blood, TCs were locked up into enclaves, TCs were brought to the brink of extinction and starvation, and TCs have suffered from an unjust embargo imposed mainly by their GC “partners” since than. So, yes, TCs and GCs were partners, with GC a bit more executive powers, but a lot of water has gone under that bridge. TCs have suffered tremendously due to illegalities inflicted on them by GCs. Thank God we have our country now, and despite many difficulties we live secure and sovereign lives. Truly we can not live in the past and must put bad memories behind us for a better Cyprus. However, this does not mean that we should not learn from history. Circumstances are very different today in Cyprus than it was during the time of 1959 and history has taught us many lessons. So I repeat again: we want a “Partnership State of Cyprus” where the equal status and legitimacy of its co-founding parties is explicitly recognized and respected and that under it, neither side is allowed, directly or implicitly, to extend its will, legitimacy or sovereignty over the other. The principles of bi-communality, political equality and bi-zonality are the key parameters for a settlement in Cyprus that have also been endorsed by the U.N. Security Council.

Your one question in particular was rather interesting. You asked:

Show me where in the constitution it talks about "bi-zonality" and all the other crap that you have absolutely no right to demand and enforce.

It is located right after the article giving Makarios the right to invite Greek officers to murder TCs under the disgusting façade of ENOSIS.

From the address made by Archbishop Makarios III before the U.N. security council on 19 July 1974- Security Council official records, S/PV.1780)
"It may be said that it was the Cyprus Government which invited the Greek officers to staff the National Guard. I regret to say that it was a mistake on my part to bestow upon them so much trust and confidence. they abused that trust and confidence and, instead of helping in the defence of the Island`s independence, sovereignity and territorial integrity, they themselves became the aggressors."
User avatar
Murataga
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:32 pm

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:41 am

Piratis wrote:Birkibrisli, don't you think we have made enough compromises already by accepting, as you said, that the TC minority can have more powers than minorities usually have?

Also, if TCs were given a president as well then it would be equal partner, but they were given the VICE president. True the TCs were given much more than what proportionately belongs to them (and accepting that was a huge compromise from our side) but at no point they were equated to the 82% majority as such thing would be totally undemocratic.

So it seems to me the compromises are only asked from our side, with TCs wanting to gain on our loss.

As I said above the TCs are welcomed to take the "founding fathers" and the "partnerships" and everything as it was agreed in 1960 agreements. To gain even more on our loss by enforcing illegalities and trying to blackmail us to accept their outrageous demands is not acceptable and I consider it a hostile move that can only be countered by similar measures.


Hello,Piratis...
What you say is true of course,it was a big compromise on the part of the GC community to agree to the 1960 constitution.And I am also aware of the Tax bill which was blocked by the TC MPs,which was the trigger for Makarios' 13 point changes. Both sides signed the 1960 agreement without any intention of honouring it,and it is pointless to try to allocate blame.

Perhaps given the realities of today,the TCs should reciprocate by giving up their dream of Partition,and get back to the best possible solution which will probably involve some sort of bi-communal federation. I think the TCs should give up their demand for bi-zonality so that everybody who wants to return to their former homes/lands can do so.Provided of course that their physical security is guaranteed to their satisfaction.
What I want is for all of us to stop dragging up the past and try to blame everything on the other side.
I read Murataga's post above and he is a typical case.He only talks about the pain and suffering of the TCs.This is no way to solve this problem.
We must find it within our hearts to show empathy to the other side,then we will see that we are all human beings with all the human faults,trying to make sense of a sensless world,and an even more senseless Cyprus conflict.When Murataga starts talking about the pain of the GCs and when you Piratis start to talk about the injustices forced upon the TCs between 63-74 period,we will move one step closer to a solution.Please don't do it for me but for our homeland,our motherland,our Cyprus.Before it is too late and the only way to solve this conflict is by exterminating one of the communities from the island. :cry: :cry:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby miltiades » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:47 am

Birkibrisli wrote:
Piratis wrote:Birkibrisli, don't you think we have made enough compromises already by accepting, as you said, that the TC minority can have more powers than minorities usually have?

Also, if TCs were given a president as well then it would be equal partner, but they were given the VICE president. True the TCs were given much more than what proportionately belongs to them (and accepting that was a huge compromise from our side) but at no point they were equated to the 82% majority as such thing would be totally undemocratic.

So it seems to me the compromises are only asked from our side, with TCs wanting to gain on our loss.

As I said above the TCs are welcomed to take the "founding fathers" and the "partnerships" and everything as it was agreed in 1960 agreements. To gain even more on our loss by enforcing illegalities and trying to blackmail us to accept their outrageous demands is not acceptable and I consider it a hostile move that can only be countered by similar measures.


Hello,Piratis...
What you say is true of course,it was a big compromise on the part of the GC community to agree to the 1960 constitution.And I am also aware of the Tax bill which was blocked by the TC MPs,which was the trigger for Makarios' 13 point changes. Both sides signed the 1960 agreement without any intention of honouring it,and it is pointless to try to allocate blame.

Perhaps given the realities of today,the TCs should reciprocate by giving up their dream of Partition,and get back to the best possible solution which will probably involve some sort of bi-communal federation. I think the TCs should give up their demand for bi-zonality so that everybody who wants to return to their former homes/lands can do so.Provided of course that their physical security is guaranteed to their satisfaction.
What I want is for all of us to stop dragging up the past and try to blame everything on the other side.
I read Murataga's post above and he is a typical case.He only talks about the pain and suffering of the TCs.This is no way to solve this problem.
We must find it within our hearts to show empathy to the other side,then we will see that we are all human beings with all the human faults,trying to make sense of a sensless world,and an even more senseless Cyprus conflict.When Murataga starts talking about the pain of the GCs and when you Piratis start to talk about the injustices forced upon the TCs between 63-74 period,we will move one step closer to a solution.Please don't do it for me but for our homeland,our motherland,our Cyprus.Before it is too late and the only way to solve this conflict is by exterminating one of the communities from the island. :cry: :cry:

Bir , as you know I'm totaly committed to one Cyprus , just as you are , and frankly the majority / minority issues only cloud our efforts to unite our island where we are all majorities and we are all minorities. Provided we are all first and foremost Cypriots that for me is the ideal situation . If a G/C named Andreas can be the president of Cyprus , there is no reason why a T/C named Ahmed can not also. Now if Andreas and Ahmed are true Cypriots and have in their heart the welfare of our nation , why should I or any one else object.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby humanist » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:52 am

I reckon in a fair and just democratic countrey all citizens should have equal rights, why should the vice president always be turkish speaking cypriot, why not give the opportunity to someone with good social, economic and political policies the chance to be presisdent if the people vote for him regardless of their sex, race, sexuality, language or reliligious affiliation. America could have its first Africanm American leader.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby Piratis » Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:42 am

Birkibrisli wrote:
Piratis wrote:Birkibrisli, don't you think we have made enough compromises already by accepting, as you said, that the TC minority can have more powers than minorities usually have?

Also, if TCs were given a president as well then it would be equal partner, but they were given the VICE president. True the TCs were given much more than what proportionately belongs to them (and accepting that was a huge compromise from our side) but at no point they were equated to the 82% majority as such thing would be totally undemocratic.

So it seems to me the compromises are only asked from our side, with TCs wanting to gain on our loss.

As I said above the TCs are welcomed to take the "founding fathers" and the "partnerships" and everything as it was agreed in 1960 agreements. To gain even more on our loss by enforcing illegalities and trying to blackmail us to accept their outrageous demands is not acceptable and I consider it a hostile move that can only be countered by similar measures.


Hello,Piratis...
What you say is true of course,it was a big compromise on the part of the GC community to agree to the 1960 constitution.And I am also aware of the Tax bill which was blocked by the TC MPs,which was the trigger for Makarios' 13 point changes. Both sides signed the 1960 agreement without any intention of honouring it,and it is pointless to try to allocate blame.

Perhaps given the realities of today,the TCs should reciprocate by giving up their dream of Partition,and get back to the best possible solution which will probably involve some sort of bi-communal federation. I think the TCs should give up their demand for bi-zonality so that everybody who wants to return to their former homes/lands can do so.Provided of course that their physical security is guaranteed to their satisfaction.
What I want is for all of us to stop dragging up the past and try to blame everything on the other side.
I read Murataga's post above and he is a typical case.He only talks about the pain and suffering of the TCs.This is no way to solve this problem.
We must find it within our hearts to show empathy to the other side,then we will see that we are all human beings with all the human faults,trying to make sense of a sensless world,and an even more senseless Cyprus conflict.When Murataga starts talking about the pain of the GCs and when you Piratis start to talk about the injustices forced upon the TCs between 63-74 period,we will move one step closer to a solution.Please don't do it for me but for our homeland,our motherland,our Cyprus.Before it is too late and the only way to solve this conflict is by exterminating one of the communities from the island. :cry: :cry:


That was a good post Bir. I agree with almost* everything that you said.

Of course I recognize the suffering of TCs between 63-74, but as you said both sides were to blame for the conflict of that time and both sides had about the same number of casualties. Note thats one decade. If you look at the rest of our common history on this island, which includes the years after 1974 until today then you will see that those that insist on illegalities and crimes are the TCs and Turks, and not the GCs.

So based on the above facts, tell me how are the the TCs, who are equally guilty for the 63-74, but have exclusivity of guild for almost everything else apart from the only decade they seem to remember, excused to demand that they should be reward on our expense?

So yes, I recognize the few 100s of TC victims by EOKA B during 1963-68 and 1974. They should also recognize the few 100s of victims by TMT during 63-68 and their equal responsibility for what happened during that period, they should recognize the 6000 GCs that died and the 200.000 that were forced out of their homes in 1974, they should recognize the 32 years that the occupation and their illegalities goes on (and I will not even go further in history when the Turks had GCs as mere slaves for 3 centuries and butchered 10s of thousands of them).

So if there was one side that should demand the punishment of the other and their reward as a compensation for what happened in the past, that side should be the GCs, not the TCs.

However as usual, the TCs and Turks instead of accepting an end to illegalities and crimes so we can finally have peace, they give lame excuses trying to excuse even more crimes and illegalities TODAY and they expect that by illegally keeping the north part of Cyprus as a hostage they can blackmail us to accept their outrageous demands which even violate our basic human rights.

1960 agreements, as we agreed, were a huge compromise for Greek Cypriots and the Turks have no right or excuse to demand any further compromises from us in order to gain even more on our loss.

Therefore the solution is for the TCs to finally accept those agreements in the way we accepted them and then without blackmails and force see if we can make mutual compromises based on those agreements to have something better for both sides. If we can't came to such agreement then 1960 agreements should remain as they are.

Those that dream that we will capitulate to their blackmails because they have big guns and allow them to gain on our loss they should forget about it. We will fight them with everything that we have and they should be sure that as always, they will lose at least as much as we do due to their insistence on illegalities and they will never be allowed a victory on our loss.

* The "almost everything" I said in my first sentence was regarding your idea of a solution. As I said the compromises, if any, should be mutual so if TCs will take something more from than the 1960 agreements then at the same time they should also give up something of equivalent importance to restore the balance so nobody would be gaining on the loss of another.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:01 pm

miltiades wrote:Bir , as you know I'm totaly committed to one Cyprus , just as you are , and frankly the majority / minority issues only cloud our efforts to unite our island where we are all majorities and we are all minorities. Provided we are all first and foremost Cypriots that for me is the ideal situation . If a G/C named Andreas can be the president of Cyprus , there is no reason why a T/C named Ahmed can not also. Now if Andreas and Ahmed are true Cypriots and have in their heart the welfare of our nation , why should I or any one else object.


I agree ,dear miltiades. If we could only forget our differences (language and religion) and concentrate on what we have in common (Cyprus,our motherland,our humanity,our common history ,our common culture and traditions,our common gene pool,our common worldview and mentality etc etc) we can solve this thing in 5 minutes.But that is not going to happen because you and I want it.The winds of suspition and mistrust are being fanned as we speak.There are too many global powers whose interest lies in a divided Cyprus,as you know well. We were never allowed to become a nation in 1963,and they will certainly not going to let us now.
We have to start from somewhere,and try to outsmart those who don't want to see us united. We are not doing that as long as we are caught up in mutual accusations about who started what, when, and how badly one side was off, and whose fault it all was. I am very frustrated as you will understand,because I can see this thing dragging on another 50 years,by then you and I will be pushing up daisies... We need to start from the reality on the ground today and work forwards to get a solution both sides will be happy to live with for longer than 3 years...We are not doing that,and my heart getting heavier and heavier with each passing day...
Can one die from heartache brought on by longing for one's lost country??? :cry: :cry: :cry:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests