by askimwos » Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:15 am
Interesting to see an "EU" group crying out for Greece to get involved more in the issues related with the RoC!!!
Very one-sided I would say...all it does it to call the RoC to make more and more concessions without saying how these are going to help reunification - the concession it proposes amount to de jure recognition of the trnc - it does not say anything about the aftereffects of such a move.
Interesting to see the board proposing co-management of the Famagusta port between TCs and EU leaving out the GC side without even proposing the return of a city that is empty and rotting. What a nice confidence building measure.
Also interesting is the call to Tpap to give a list to the UN SG of the proposed changes to the Anan plan - I had the impression that this was done almost a year ago.
On the other hand there is a call to stop selling GC properties but at the same time "recognises" the so called compensation committee in the occupied areas. Tell me who of these people would accept a foreign country to invade, capture their home and accept a committee formed by the occupier to judge whether they can return be compensated etc? Totally absurd!
Furthermore, the whole document gives the impression that the GCs don't want a bicommunal, bizonal federation but rather a centralised state. This is another absurd conclusion which does not even care to look at the major political parties in the RoC and the decisions from the National Council where there is a unanimous decision since 1989 about the nature of the solution seeked (bicommunal, bizonal federation).
And here is the most ridiculous one:
(d) revising the current proposals for direct trade to include the incorporation of northern Cyprus into the EU customs union with Turkey,
In other words the board proposed the annexation of north cyprus to Turkey in a quite official way. The last time I checked (protocol 10) the EU considered the RoC to have one sovereignty, only for the acquis to be suspended for the occupied areas due to the occupation.
Btw can anyone let me know whether this International Crisis Board is an official part of the EU or whether this is just another of the so many think tanks? If the latter is the case there are a number of such think tanks that at times came out with completely different proposals.
Last edited by
askimwos on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:34 am, edited 2 times in total.