Piratis wrote:Turkcyp,
What you want is to solve your problem, get all your 1960 rights and everything, while at the same time you keep the occupation and the problem of GCs remains unsolved.
With a few words: will not happen.
The earlier you understand this, the better for all of us.
Ah logic, great logic,
What would I do with my 1960 constitution rights if I am not going to use them. Please use your logic before you say something. Supporting occupation means I am not moving under the jurisdiction of RoC, and if I am not moving under the jurisdiction of RoC then I will not be able to use my rights from 1960 constitution anyway. So why would I be wanting those rights, if I really want parturition. Use your logic before making accusations at least.
RoC entered in the EU in a perfectly legal way and from a legal perspective we are covered.
Basically you guys can win in only one way: Force.
When it comes to legal issues you loose (because you are wrong).
Both of these are proven by reality (turkey continues the occupation by force, while court cases are won by GCs), and there is nothing much to argue about.
Telling me that TCs will gain something through courts is like if I tell you that GCs will gain something by war.
1) Never said that RoC in Eu is illegal. I believe it is illegal but I do not decide about the legality. Outside courts do. So basically whether I accept it or not it is not illegal.
2) You have no idea of what being in EU means. First of all, there is no one court case against either TCs or Turkey in EU courts. EU courts do not have jurisdiction over Turkey yet, (not before full membership). You are confusing ECHR with EU.
3) Thirdly do you really thing that if TCs apply to ECHR about their constitutional rights they would not win. You can not claim that we have occupy your land and apply to ECHR and at the same time refuse to give TCs land back when they decide to turn back to south as in the last case in RoC. Even your own courts decided that it is against human rights RoC stopping TC get their land back in south.
4) And do you really think if all the TCs turn back to south, and the only people left behind in north is the settlers and the TCs that used to live in north before 1974. And after this if they decide to use their constitutional rights, then RoC restricting use of these rights would be found legal in EU courts. If as you claim RoC is accepted to EU with 1960 constitution, then our rights from that constitution will be enforceable in EU courts. All TCs are doing right now, is to wait and see if there is a political solution to problem.
Do not worry. TCs started to get their rights back slowly but surely from 1960 constitution. Pretty much every TC that I know now have renewed their IDs and passports with the new ones. So it is obvious that we are citizens of RoC.
Then the court cases start to come. First as you see as in the last property case in south. You have to give our property back if I decide to move back to south.
After I got my property back and establish my residency do not worry we will try to elect 1/3 of MPs and vice president as well. We will see if you will stop us, or do not accept our representatives as legit. If you do not, then there are other courts that we will apply in EU as well.
Do not worry the wheels are turning….
If you disagree ... sue me
What would I sue you. I will sue RoC.
What you are doing is to get all your rights back through legal cases and when it comes to giving our rights back you say it is a political situation. We will see how this will hold in the courts…
I am very comfortable from where I sit. It’s you who is living in a delusional world.
But keep on dreaming that you can keep the whole island to yourself without giving our rights back….