miltiades wrote:Firstly we do not hate the Greeks
It wasn't me who called the Greeks a "sick nation"
miltiades wrote:neither do we blame the Greek people for the terrible mess that the Junta created in 1974 .
Wrong, there are more than a few Cypriots who blame "the Greeks" and not "the Junta" for 74
miltiades wrote:The support that Greece gave and still does to Cyprus is appreciated and her encouraging role in Cyprus entry into Europe is admirable. Our strong economy has been influenced by a number of factors but most certainly the "Greek " factor was not and neither is now the predominant one.
What I meant to say was that, without that support from Greece which you "appreciate" Cyprus would now simply be a Turkish province.
miltiades wrote:We wanted ENOSIS 50 years ago because we needed a guiding light having never in our history experienced the precious commodity of running our own affairs.
You wanted ENOSIS when ENOSIS was not only impossible, but also a threat for the very lives of Cyrpiots. Greece put the well being of the Cypriot people before any nationalistic aspirations of border expansion, and pushed for the creation of a new state that Cypriots did not want. Anyway, you obviously agree that Cyrpiots were wrong for wanting enosis and Greece was right.
miltiades wrote:Our schooling was greatly influnced by the Greek factor and our churches were at the forefront of the struggle for ENOSIS.
No Greek government forced you to teach the Greek history textbooks to your people and the Greek church was (and is) autocephalus.
miltiades wrote:The Greek politicians of the past must bear responsibility also for rejecting
Cyprus when handed on the plate back in early 20th century. A great favour they did for us as far as I'm concerned.
If that was a favour, why do you talk about "responsibility"? Are you bitter deep inside that Enosis did not happen? Besides, it was not Greek politicians but the Greek king that rejected Greece's entry to WWI in exchange for Cyprus, and rightly so. The fact that Greece entered the war later on could not be known beforehand.
miltiades wrote:Why is it that hard to understand that there is such identity as the Turkish Cypriots and the Greek Cypriots.
There's nothing hard to understand. For me, you are a Greek Cypriot, a Cypriot, a Greek, a Turk or an Englishman if you wish to be one. What I don't understand is people not accepting OTHER people's declaring of Greekness or Turkishness.
miltiades wrote:The need to "belong " to Turkey or Greece is redundant
Do you believe that Greece supports or promotes or creates the need of Cypriots to "belong" to Greece? If you do, you couldn't be more wrong. That "need" is only natural to people who share the same language, the same religion, the same customs, listen to the same music, have common interests, common "enemies" and in general interact as if they are one nation.
miltiades wrote:since our nation has proved beyond question that it can govern itself adequately
Do you mean that? Should we take Papadopoulos's actions as an example of adequate governing? The man would have thrown you out of the EU if it wasn't for Karamanlis, he is easily the most disliked (if not hated) of all the EU leaders. Greece never took decisions FOR Cyprus but, you have to admit, your presidents had to be taken by the hand by Greece each time important decisions had to be made. On such occasions, the President of the RoC would travel to Athens more often than he would go to the bathroom.