Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:If we are going to agree a BBF type solution then I dont see the problem here, unless the GCs have hidden agendas!!! they should not see it as recognition but a sharing excercise, you have an airport we have an airport, GCs adminiister one airport, TCs administer another, isnt this only natural or do you want to control all all the airports?
VP,
Nothing will make sense to you, if you do not understand the very basic rules of "Sovereign State" and a "de facto State".
Once you can understand these differences, then everything else will start making sense to you. So stop questioning the "obvious" as to why things are not done to your liking, and start accepting, why things are done, the way they are.
Would we not do the same, if the shoe was on the other foot.
Alldown to leveling playing field the GCs cannot comprehend allowing ud the same advantages which they feel are exclusively the right of GCs, but we will fight for what we need and never forget their policies just like we have not forgotten the past, they always ring true to form dont you think?
With all due respect VP, I do not think you understood what I wrote at all. You're giving me more of the same of your usual arguments, which does not help solve any of the problems the TC's face.
Perhaps you should read my post one more time.