Viewpoint wrote:askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There appears to be an increase in pregnant GC women wanting abortions due to the money being offered for a 3rd child. They say they would rather get rid of the current pregnancy and wait for the bill to be passed and then have the 3rd child. What a morbid world we live in.
Either you cut the bullshiting or give proofs, cause this policy has been just announce and the bill is in its draft form.
You are pathetic!!!
Ask Maria Kyriacou from Disi she claims that there has been a sudden rush on clinics from women who are in early stages of pregnancywho want abortions.
You are the pathetic one, money drives people crazy didnt you know this and seeing GCs are very materialistic they will do anything to get their hands on this money.
askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There appears to be an increase in pregnant GC women wanting abortions due to the money being offered for a 3rd child. They say they would rather get rid of the current pregnancy and wait for the bill to be passed and then have the 3rd child. What a morbid world we live in.
Either you cut the bullshiting or give proofs, cause this policy has been just announce and the bill is in its draft form.
You are pathetic!!!
Ask Maria Kyriacou from Disi she claims that there has been a sudden rush on clinics from women who are in early stages of pregnancywho want abortions.
You are the pathetic one, money drives people crazy didnt you know this and seeing GCs are very materialistic they will do anything to get their hands on this money.
Blah, blah, blah...
The policy has been announced on Monday - this is 26 FEBRUARY 2007!
Today is the 28th February 2007. Can you explain how the hell what you state is true? When was the data collected?
But you still haven't answered the original question? Do you agree with this policy? Does it benefit TCs? Is it a policy that will help TCs that face the danger of extinction on the island thanks to the illegal settlers?
Still waiting for your answer! Any hope of getting one?
askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There appears to be an increase in pregnant GC women wanting abortions due to the money being offered for a 3rd child. They say they would rather get rid of the current pregnancy and wait for the bill to be passed and then have the 3rd child. What a morbid world we live in.
Either you cut the bullshiting or give proofs, cause this policy has been just announce and the bill is in its draft form.
You are pathetic!!!
Ask Maria Kyriacou from Disi she claims that there has been a sudden rush on clinics from women who are in early stages of pregnancywho want abortions.
You are the pathetic one, money drives people crazy didnt you know this and seeing GCs are very materialistic they will do anything to get their hands on this money.
DT wrote:askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:askimwos wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There appears to be an increase in pregnant GC women wanting abortions due to the money being offered for a 3rd child. They say they would rather get rid of the current pregnancy and wait for the bill to be passed and then have the 3rd child. What a morbid world we live in.
Either you cut the bullshiting or give proofs, cause this policy has been just announce and the bill is in its draft form.
You are pathetic!!!
Ask Maria Kyriacou from Disi she claims that there has been a sudden rush on clinics from women who are in early stages of pregnancywho want abortions.
You are the pathetic one, money drives people crazy didnt you know this and seeing GCs are very materialistic they will do anything to get their hands on this money.
VP 2 days ago you accussed GC's of sacrificing money making ventures with nationalistic pride by not doing business with TC businessmen and may I roughly quote "you prefer to stick to your nationalistic views and sacrifice profit????I'll never understand the GC mind."
today you are accussing the GC's of being very materialistic they will do anything to get their hands on this money...!!
make your mind up mate.
askimwos wrote:VP can you give a straight answer to the questions asked please?
Do you agree with this policy?
Does it benefit TCs?
Is it a policy that will help TCs that face the danger of extinction on the island thanks to the illegal settlers?
Still waiting and waiting for your answer! Any hope of getting a real answer please?
PS: I won't comment on the absurd example about the TC couple.
Viewpoint wrote:askimwos wrote:VP can you give a straight answer to the questions asked please?
Do you agree with this policy?
Does it benefit TCs?
Is it a policy that will help TCs that face the danger of extinction on the island thanks to the illegal settlers?
Still waiting and waiting for your answer! Any hope of getting a real answer please?
PS: I won't comment on the absurd example about the TC couple.
The TC couple comment is absoulutely true I remember this vividly as they have 2 children and we laughed about them being prime candidates.
The finacial benefit is unquestionable but it is really aimed at GCs having one of the lowest birth rates in the EU 1.4 if I am not wrong you have to get this 2.1 if you are even going to keep your current population levels, not TCs the"RoC" can hardly exclude their own citizens which they claim to represent how do you think this would have gone down with your EU masters?
Do you agree with this policy?
Does it benefit TCs?
Is it a policy that will help TCs that face the danger of extinction on the island thanks to the illegal settlers?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest