The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Brits say no to north direct flights

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Brits say no to north direct flights

Postby pitsilos » Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:21 pm

Brits say no to north direct flights

TURKISH Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat has confirmed that Britain has official rejected his request for direct flights between Britain and the north. Britain informed Cyprus Turkish Airlines it is was not legally possible to launch direct flights to Tymbou (Ercan) airport. Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot side maintained there was no legal obstacle to such flights when the application was made to the UK authority late last year. Talat told Kibris newspaper that the ‘TRNC’ had launched a new legal process with the aid of a mediation office in the UK that specialised in such issues.


Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2007

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.php?id=30918&cat_id=1



if the poms can't help, i guess thats the end for the road on direct flights to the occupied areas.
pitsilos
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Brits say no to north direct flights

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:35 pm

pitsilos wrote:
Brits say no to north direct flights

TURKISH Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat has confirmed that Britain has official rejected his request for direct flights between Britain and the north. Britain informed Cyprus Turkish Airlines it is was not legally possible to launch direct flights to Tymbou (Ercan) airport. Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot side maintained there was no legal obstacle to such flights when the application was made to the UK authority late last year. Talat told Kibris newspaper that the ‘TRNC’ had launched a new legal process with the aid of a mediation office in the UK that specialised in such issues.


Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2007

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.php?id=30918&cat_id=1



if the poms can't help, i guess thats the end for the road on direct flights to the occupied areas.


We dont give up that easy...there is no other alternative due to lack or progress so we will pursue what we feel is right and you can do the same.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby pitsilos » Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:48 pm

well it has been 26 whole years. but feel free to try and try and try and try and try. no one is stopping you.

have you tried sealand by the way?

here is the webpage

http://www.sealandgov.com/
pitsilos
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:04 am

Postby LENA » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:00 pm

God bless UK!!!
User avatar
LENA
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:45 pm

Postby shahmaran » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:19 pm

:?
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby Simon » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:26 pm

:lol:
User avatar
Simon
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:47 pm

Postby shahmaran » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:39 pm

*£$%^!
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby miltiades » Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:02 am

With the risk of sounding conceited !! does anybody really think that the International aviation authorities will permit direct flights to a destination that the ENTIRE world considers to be an illegal entity , under occupation by Turkey !! There are accepted ESTABLISHED legal protocols that International bodies must adhere to , failing to do so would lead to anarchy , so lets stop this nonsense that direct flights other than those by the occupier will take place. There is no viable legal reason for the International Aviation authorities to allow such flights.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby LENA » Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:18 am

miltiades wrote:With the risk of sounding conceited !! does anybody really think that the International aviation authorities will permit direct flights to a destination that the ENTIRE world considers to be an illegal entity , under occupation by Turkey !! There are accepted ESTABLISHED legal protocols that International bodies must adhere to , failing to do so would lead to anarchy , so lets stop this nonsense that direct flights other than those by the occupier will take place. There is no viable legal reason for the International Aviation authorities to allow such flights.


Miltiades I agree with you but the problem here is that they do allow this flight even if its from north of Cyprus to Turkey or the opposite...and as Shah said he travel from there with a TRNC passport to UK... That's the whole issue...why the permit those flights since its illegal?
User avatar
LENA
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:45 pm

Postby paaul12 » Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:19 am

God bless the UK, i agree with u lena.

http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.ph ... &archive=1

BRITISH FOREIGN Secretary Jack Straw has accused the government of unacceptably using EU membership to solve the Cyprus problem and of deliberately marginalising the Turkish Cypriots.

The comments, made during a House of Commons session on Tuesday are sure to spark another political furore on the island and further damage already strained relations between Cyprus and Britain.

A furious government spokesman George Lillikas last night blasted the comments as provocative, unacceptable and as having twisted the truth.

He said official representations would be made to Britain through the Foreign Ministry.

During the Commons debate, Straw said it was a matter of great regret that President Tassos Papadopoulos had refused to see him and that the Greek Cypriot side has sought to distance themselves from the Turkish Cypriot community “and to cease to have any contact with it”.

The British Foreign Secretary was snubbed by President Tassos Papadopoulos over his decision to also visit the Turkish Cypriot leader in the north’s ‘presidential palace’. Two days later in Ankara, Straw lent his support to Turkish proposals to revive the negotiations, which further angered the Greek Cypriot side.

“Moreover, because of their unhelpful approach towards the aid proposals for the north from the European Union, they are in my judgment seeking to marginalise the Turkish Cypriot community and not in any way to assist in their economic development,” he said.

“I suspect, the government of Cyprus are now seeking to use their membership of the EU to try unacceptably to seek progress on their United Nations-related issues,” he added.

At the end of his visit last month, Straw suggested the Greek Cypriots should be grateful for Britain’s support for its accession.

However Lillikas said the truth was that Britain had helped for the simple reason that it assumed that accession would go hand in hand with the failed Annan plan, which he said supported Turkish and British interests. “What Britain doesn’t forgive is Greek Cypriots’ rejection of the plan,” said Lillikas.

“These statements show that Mr Straw identifies fully with the Turkish Cypriot position and that clearly Britain cannot be an objective mediator on the Cyprus issue. Britain no longer has the necessary credibility. They are neither neutral nor objective.”

Lillikas said the Cyprus government had shown in practice its support for the Turkish Cypriots. “He is twisting the truth and the facts. He knows very well there is a whole package of support measures for Turkish Cypriots includes substantial aid, not to mention medical care and work. He knows because he’s part of a government that knows about the Cyprus problem and that’s what is very sad.”

The spokesman said that the government would not ask for Britain to be excluded from future negotiations because they were directly involved. “But we will clearly ask for involvement of all five permanent members of the UN Security Council,” he said.

Lillikas also accused Straw of making veiled threats with regards to the recognition of the north. Although he repeated that Britain did not recognise the ‘TRNC’, Straw said the current approach of the government of Cyprus “does not in any way represent movement towards a united Cyprus and objectively is likely to lead to the opposite result.”

He also suggested that the Greek Cypriot side did not know what it was doing with regards to a solution. “Mr Iacovou, the Foreign Minister of Cyprus whom I saw, could offer me no alternative prospect for his own people and for solving their problems.

“That is why I regret very much the negative approach that that government are taking,” he said.
User avatar
paaul12
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:57 pm

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests