by Pete_D » Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:13 pm
pitsilos i'm not going to bother to trawl through the forum to find any examples, but I would not be surprised if - were i the sort of individual to attack you, which I am not - i would end up saying you were also guilty of this sort of bad behaviour which at times borders on the idiotic and pointless.
Devil was not proposing to temporarily suspend the whole forum, just the cyprus problem section and to rule that no-one should use any other section to publicise any cyprus problem type issues (and presumably, that any attempt to do so should lead to immediate deletion of the post and/or a ban).
As for swearing, I do not think it should necessarily be banned because a) it is so difficult to police and b) any minors viewing this site could easily be exposed to this sort of language elsewhere on the internet. And it is easily circumnavigated, for example if I want to I can call you a tw&t and we all know what I have said but i did not use a swear word.
However, that said, when members are swearing simply to use bad language or attack another member then I obviously don't think that is acceptable. And what it normally means is that said member has lost the argument and has resorted to the lowest common denominator - a personal attack.
I have to say, people on this forum get away with an awful lot which would not be tolerated on other forums. This may be because the Admin is trying to encourage free discussion and treat us all like adults. But a number of members totally abuse this privilege.
The problem is that the Admin and moderators are only humans and presumably are not paid directly for their work on this forum, so are not able to police it to the extent they might like. Also, when a forum starts getting heavy handed it can get too bureaucratic at times. Devil you probably appreciate that from the fact you administrate another forum yourself?
Anyway mr. pitsilos, what a shame that it would appear you decided to use this thread to attack other forum members - i.e viewpoint - it certainly would appear to readers that this was a thinly veiled attempt to promote your own, some would say, corrupt agenda.
Pete