boulio wrote:what a national of a certain country does does not mean the actually country is doing,im sure there are british and canadian citizens of G/C descent buying properties in the north,does that mean that britain,canada,or the republic of cyprus are investing in the north?
For god's sake, when did you last time see a country investing in another country directly? Tell me an instance where United Kingdon invested in RoC. Only citizens, and companies do the investing. Not the countries.
The trade and investment issue is very simple. Countries would either let citizens and companies invest and/or trade with north or not. If a country is not stopping transfer of money from its banks to north, is not prosecuting its citizens that comes to north, is not prosecuting its firms that invest in north, is not stoping the goods that are coming from north, then a country can be said to let its citizens and firms invest and trade with north.
So far very there are some restrictions on these but they are not perfect, and they are lifting the remaining ones as times goes by as I see it.
For example, if the courts in UK refuse to uphold the court decision taken in south regarding the property in the north biught by that English citizen. This is an indirect free pass for English citizens to invest in north.
Anyway only time will tell us whether further restrictions will be lifted or not.
Furthemore even if all the restrictions are lifted this still does not imply that that country recognizes TRNC as a "sovering legal country". Israel my never recognize sovereignity of TRNC but it may very well let its citizens do business with north.