Alexis wrote:Hi observer,
You say as if it is a fact. Is it? I am simply asking, I have no idea. From what I have heard (and this is purely anecdotal), any new EU member has to (unofficially) choose one primary language to be given EU status and one language only. Having said this a number of countries, notably Spain with Catalan, have recently being pushing to have secondary languages to be given official EU status. Even so the EU has only made these official working languages and not given them EU language status. The difference being that EU documents are not translated into these languages although correspondence with the EU can be made in them.
Another example is Irish, which is Eire's 1st language but has only just been given EU status. The reason being that even though it was the 1st language fewer people spoke it than spoke English. Basically it seems that any one member can only choose one language to be given EU status. What the RoC could do and has not yet is ask for Turkish to be made an official working language of the EU (as is Catalan/Basque etc...). Given the current circumstances it is probably not worth doing so yet.
So all I'm saying is, are you sure it was Cyprus that refrained from asking Turkish to be given EU status or could it have been more the other way around? Just some food for thought.
Come on Alexis dont be like that...VP will be disappointed...anything we do its wrong...we chose an ancient statue from Cypriot history...which has nothing to so with the religion...and they turn it to a religion issue...we wrote Turkish on the coins and they start a whole argument about the official language. Whatever we do its not good, its not fair...we put an effort they put nothing...but we are the bad guys here!!!!
By the way thank you for this info...I didnt really knew that!!!!