The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


War Crimes Tribunal for T.Papadopoulos

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Who believes Tassos Papadopoulos should be brought to the war crimes tribunal?

YES
18
64%
NO
10
36%
MAYBE
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 28

Postby Alexandros Lordos » Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:19 pm

Piratis wrote:
I want to continue to make clear Piratis's blatant racist attiutdes.


Ok, thief, you can continue to do so, see if i give a shit :lol:

If not liking/hating people that are criminals makes me a racist, then let it be so. Guilty as charged!

As I said in anther post though, you should judge your racist views before you judge others. You insist to split people along racist lines, to give people different kind of rights based on race. If I am a racist of words, you are a racist of actions, and that dear thief is much worst.



Hey, Piratis, take it easy man ...
Alexandros Lordos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:41 pm

Postby Othellos » Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:36 pm

I agree. Piratis take it easy re. Say what you have to say and try supporting it with arguments. There is no need to resort in personal insults.

O.
Othellos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:52 pm

Postby Piratis » Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:57 pm

There is no need to resort in personal insults.


I agree. I made a general remark (not a personal attack), as a reply to another general remark (about Hellenes by Insan).

Then Erolz made the purpose of his life to attack me personally, and when I tried to make things a bit more calm he said I am "backtracking".

So you should direct your advice to Erolz, since he is the one who choose and insisted upon the personal insults way. Apparently he run out of arguments and decided that it would be easier for him to attack me personally than to attack my arguments.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Alexandros Lordos » Sun Jan 09, 2005 1:45 pm

Piratis wrote:
There is no need to resort in personal insults.


I agree. I made a general remark (not a personal attack), as a reply to another general remark (about Hellenes by Insan).

Then Erolz made the purpose of his life to attack me personally, and when I tried to make things a bit more calm he said I am "backtracking".

So you should direct your advice to Erolz, since he is the one who choose and insisted upon the personal insults way. Apparently he run out of arguments and decided that it would be easier for him to attack me personally than to attack my arguments.


OK, Piratis, you have a point also ...

Maybe we should all resist the temptation of splitting the members of this forum into "good guys" and "bad guys", and stay focused on arguing about issues rather than persons.

Erol, what do you think?
Alexandros Lordos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:41 pm

Postby insan » Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:20 pm

I agree. I made a general remark (not a personal attack), as a reply to another general remark (about Hellenes by Insan).



Which of my views about "Hellens", "Hellen's ruling elite", "Hellen's far right" disturbed you Piratis?
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby erolz » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:00 pm

Alexandros Lordos wrote:
Erol, what do you think?


Generally I agree that everyone should try and avoid 'personalising' their posts in forums. It does nothing to continue and contribute to the debate.

However I also believe that racism should be confronted and challeneged.

Because of the former I for a long time 'ignored' Piratis' blatantly racists remarks (racist in a clear unambiguous un sophisticated way). He has made these remakrs about Turks on more than one occasion.

So I see it as a balance. I tollerated these racist comments in the past and tried to focus on presenting my views with as little personalisation as possible - yet the racist posting from Piratis continued. I made a decision to no longer let such blatantly racist posts go unchalleneged for their racist views. As I said before in any other situation I would not have waited so long before doing this. In any other situation I would have challenged these racist comments from the first time they were made.

I am afraid that I have now made my decsion (although if I am asked by the admin to stop posting about Piratis's racist comments I will do so). As long as Piratis makes these racist comments I will challenge them. As long as he seeks to defend having made them, or blame others for him having made them, I will challeneg him. I am sorry but to not do this is for me a matter of concience. I would stress this is not my forum and I will abide by the the judgement of the owner of the forum.
erolz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Girne / Kyrenia

Postby DigenisAkritas » Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:54 pm

KELEBEK wrote:alexander was a macedonian who were and still are slavs. Macedonia the state is a slavic country.


Really? The first Slavs to arrive in Hellas were those who came when the Byzantine Empire 'effectively became a State', after Emperor Heraclius around the 7th Century AD, most archeological evidence suggests they returned North to Northern Balkan States around 9th Century AD, short of having a time machine, Alexander could not have been a Slav. Ancient Macedonia is part of Modern day Hellas anyway. And in regards to the Greeks 'not considering themselves Greek', thats rubbish, there was the idea of 'City First', 'Greek World Second', but that's true of the Romans as well, they didn't consider themselves 'Italian'. They considered the other Latin Tribes to be barbarians.
DigenisAkritas
Member
Member
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:52 pm

Postby Main_Source » Mon Jul 25, 2005 2:35 am

Erolz,

When you stop being so biased toward TC views and be seen picking up idiots like VP on there blatent racist remarks...then maybe you will be taken more seriously. Get off your high horse and be seen to practise what you preach. Apart from Brother, i've never seen any TC pull up another Turk/TC when writing rubbish.


Piratis might not beat around the bush when making views but he is not as one sided as TC/Turks here like to try pointout...just because he sticks the truth at people.

Keep up the fight Piratis.

...as for Klebek,

Minoans, Minecians Minoanesians whatever!


Yeah, im sure your historic information has much credibility ya dunce.
Main_Source
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2009
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:11 pm

Postby DigenisAkritas » Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:32 am

KELEBEK wrote:i agree all criminals should be brought to justice, even Turkish ones but I insist that Papadoc should be hanged by his balls.

ALLAHU AKBAR!!!!

LET US GO KILL SOME RUSSIAN 8 YEAR OLDS IN A SCHOOL!!!! TRULY WE ARE GREAT MUJAHIDS!!!!!!

...Religion of peace strikes again!
DigenisAkritas
Member
Member
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:52 pm

Postby bg_turk » Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:56 am

DigenisAkritas,

I want to know if you see the difference between:

"SOME muslims are terrorists. SOME terrorists are muslims"

and

"ALL muslims are terrorists. ALL terrorists are muslims"
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest