Piratis wrote:Erolz, you didn't answer my question: Is 30% governmental jobs for TCs fair?
In general terms not I do not think it 'fair' per se but then I alos think lots of rules and agreements are not fair as well. I have read somewhere that the reason this % was set so high was the reverse of the reason that GC claimed it could not be implmented - namely that because of the EOKA actions pre 60 there was already a disproprtionate number of TC in the British Administration and if was feared that there would not be enopugh GC with the experienced necessary to fill posts after indepnedance.
Piratis wrote:Yes, we should go to the 1960 agreements, but as it is the case in all countries, those agreements have to change to become better. For example laws changed about civil weddings, the rights of gays, the rights of women etc etc. I am not asking for something different that 1960 agreements. Just the same agreements with the progressive changes that are needed for the year 2005.
We can not stop progress because it suits you better.
And we can not just decide to ignore laws and agreements made and the rule of law and our own supreme court in the name of 'progress' just because it suits one partner community in the RoC to do so.
For me the idea of returning to the 60's agreements would be a lot easier to swallow if you could just admit that the way the GC leadership back then sought to change parts of the agreements made was illegal, unconstituional and just plain wrong. With this acceptance then I can see some 'acceptability' to the idea of return to 60's agreements. However when this return is accopanied by an direct or indirect insistance that the GC admin did nothing wrong in the way the sought change back then and had a right to behave illegaly and unconsitutionaly and to ignore their own supreme court, then there is no sense in even contemplating a return to such agreements - for it would be a recipie for disaster all over again.
If we are to talk of a return to the 60's agreements then we have to first establish and admit the parts played by our respective communites for its original failure. Both communites.