Bananiot wrote:You do not get it Piratis, do you? I am just a nobody, I have the right to criticise the officials, our elected lords. They are accountable. Can you get this into your head? This is the cornerstone of democracy. Papadopoulos and any other elected official, party apparachik etc, cannot do this to me without substantiating the accusations. If Papadopoulos says that I got money from UNOPS he has to prove it in a court of law. Otherwise he is meagre and a liar. He thrives on lies but this is because people like you prefer the blindfolds.
is there or is there not a difference between the fascists of 1974 and the today criticisers of papadopoulos?
can majorities be wrong? yes or no?
in the case papadopoulos is to blame for crimes against tc or AKEL mambers should he be allowed to become our president?
where is the better solution?
Piratis wrote: Who are the same like the fascists of 1974 are those that do not respect the democratically expressed will of the majority and they are helping the foreigners to force on us what we clearly said we do not want.
The accusations against Papadopoulos have nothing to do with reality. Do you think that if Papadopoulos was collaborating with DISI to elect Cleredes that Bananiot etc would take the job of throwing mud at him every day?
Because some people decided to put mud on our president does this means he is guilty? If they have evidence that he made crimes then why they didn't take him to the court all this time?
GC saying that the decision to say no to the annan plan was wrong are traitors and facists in your view?
Papadopoulos has been accused of being "Defkalion"
Piratis wrote: Instead they say " 'no' voters were mislead, stupid etc" and they do not accept that Annan plan and the like is NOT what the great majority of GCs want.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest