Cyprus-Forum.com

[karma]

gosh, i knew only 1 ENOSIS, wht is DOUBLE ENOSIS??

[Pyrpolizer]

coz every greek is proud of him including me but it doesnt make him less fascist...so you can call young turks fascists but they werent more fascist then Alex so the turks have the right of being proud of young turks too..
damn, I have been drinking since morning, lol, hope u understand my english..he he

I understand what you are trying to say-it seems you tolerate drinking well enough.

Well tell me, what genocides had Alexander the Great performed? Show me just one history book from the official history books of the nations he concured claiming he performed genocide on them. Start from Egypt and go upto India.

Just because you suppose Alexander based his Empire on slaughter doesn't make it true. The truth is Alexander based his Empire on the supremacy of his civilisation. In fact he was welcomed in most countries he concured.

Jeez you cannot even comprehend what an army of not more than 500 men could possibly do to so many million of people under Alexanders hegemony....

You are allowed a couple of sips more.

[karma]

come onnnnnn, Alex dint share roses in India.....plzzz be antikeimenikosssssssssss

[Pyrpolizer]

Double Enosis means one part of Cyprus to get annexed with Turkey and another with Greece.
So both lovely motherlands could get their piece and expand their territories.

The Greek Junta in fact had proposed this solution a long time before 1974....

[karma]

yeah Junta people has gr8 ideas both in Greece n Turkey...very smart...I love Papadopoulos..
he bakes the tastiest biscuits in Greece

[Pyrpolizer]

come onnnnnn, Alex dint share roses in India.....plzzz be antikeimenikosssssssssss

For your INFORMATION and i am really tired answering such unsupported posts Great Alexander defeated the Indian Army (hell it was extremely difficult as it was the first time he had to fight with Tanks (=cavalry using Elephants instead of horses). The Indian king bowed and submitted Alexander his swords etc.

Alexander was so much impressed by the braveness of this King during the fight that he RETURNED him his sword and HIS KINGDOM!!!

And you are telling me he wasn't sharing roses???
Probably not, but he wasn't doing what you are trying to imply either.

But why do you deny the fact the every Historian confirms? Alexanders Empire was not based on Killing but on spreading out the then SUPERIOR GREEK CIVILISATION.

[T_C]

I dunno Pyro, maybe. Why would they do that though? Do you mean like a conspiracy in Cyprus by both Turkey and Greece?

Also I have to say there are a lot of evidence and documants proving that the Armenians were slaughtering the Turks too. The Armenians never tell this side of the story however. There is evidence in the Turkish archives that they were indeed killing Turks and these archives are open to people to go see for themselves. However the Armenian archives are sealed shut and not open for inspection by anyone. Why is this?

[karma]

no 1 asked or invited Alex for that..all civilisations are superiors including Zulu...there is nothing superior or primitive...coz it is so relative..dont talk like Adolf..

[Pyrpolizer]

Karma like it or not a superior civilisation always prevails without having to kill.
And yes the civilisation that uses cars for transport is superior to the one who uses donkies, and sooner or later it will prevail without having to brake a single nose

[karma]

yeah exactly, superior USA which uses cars for transport never kills