The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Armenian genocide resolution

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby T_C » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:03 am

phoenix wrote:Turkey turning to Israel as its only supporter in its failure to accept responsibility for the genocide. It's a crying shame that a nation that has suffered the Holocaust should be helping this denial.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/mid ... 101947.ece


Well maybe their stance should tell you something! :wink:

The Armenians have shot themselves on the foot by CONSTANTLY putting forth bogus evidence such as the "hitler quote".....if there was to be some sort of investigation, the Armenians ASWELL AS Turkey would be exposed and have a lot to answer for, hence why Turkey always says "lets investigate" knowing full well the Armenians will NEVER accept as it would raise doubts on the Armenian story.

Most people agree it was genocide, no amount of resolutions are going to bring these people back. Its time people moved on.
User avatar
T_C
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:16 am
Location: London

Postby shahmaran » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:06 am

DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby DT. » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:18 am

shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"


excellent response Shah. I have a whole new respect for you.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby shahmaran » Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:18 am

Well thank you :)

I suppose a Kurdish state within the borders of Iraq is one realistic possibility, but i cannot see how it will be allowed nor if it will be a sufficient enough solution that would serve the interests of all the Kurds who are scattered around such a large area which crosses so many borders.
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby miltiades » Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:38 am

shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"

A very profound statement , didn't think you were capable of such superb and wise thoughts .Well done Shah .
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby DT. » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:34 pm

miltiades wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"

A very profound statement , didn't think you were capable of such superb and wise thoughts .Well done Shah .


:lol: say the truth Shah...you're a little bit worried now aren't you? :lol:
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby shahmaran » Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:00 pm

:lol: :lol:

More skeptical then worried :P
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:05 pm

shahmaran wrote:Its a crying shame that the whole matter is being exploited in such a way


As they say Shahmaran, "thine enemy is my friend". Don expect mercy from these people.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby EPSILON » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:27 pm

karma wrote:I really wonder why nobody cares about the turkish people killed by british, french, italians, greeks, armenians and others during 1914-1922...
it really sounds wierd and unfair.


Question stupid.!!!! Correction question should be: how many civilians British, Greeks,Armenians killed during 1914-1922?

A genocide can not based on the number of soldiers of the enemy (both sides) were killed. A genocide is based on the number of civilians an army is killed during a war . A genocide is based on how much unhuman the politicians/army of a country was during a war.

This is what Turks do not understand because in their internal affairs neither the life of a Turkish soldier is count neither the life of a civilian- The only scope / target is Turkey to win (Actually not Turkey but generals)

This is generaly the problem of the majority of Turkish people they can not separate actions/things - they learned only black and white coulors-nothing else. This of course is not the point of a democratic state/population
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:30 pm

EPSILON wrote:
karma wrote:I really wonder why nobody cares about the turkish people killed by british, french, italians, greeks, armenians and others during 1914-1922...
it really sounds wierd and unfair.


Question stupid.!!!! Correction question should be: how many civilians British, Greeks,Armenians killed during 1914-1922?

A genocide can not based on the number of soldiers of the enemy (both sides) were killed. A genocide is based on the number of civilians an army is killed during a war . A genocide is based on how much unhuman the politicians/army of a country was during a war.

This is what Turks do not understand because in their internal affairs neither the life of a Turkish soldier is count neither the life of a civilian- The only scope / target is Turkey to win (Actually not Turkey but generals)

This is generaly the problem of the majority of Turkish people they can not separate actions/things - they learned only black and white coulors-nothing else. This of course is not the point of a democratic state/population



This description of your, that Turkey only sees Black or White is a true description of most GCs on this forum. Anything or anybody remotely connected to Turkey is Black and everybody else is White. Right? This is Racism , Period.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests