Sotos wrote:When we know all the lies of the Turks about Cyprus why should we even consider that what they say about the Armenians could be true.
Well I'm glad you understand even if you don't realise you do. After all the (blatant) lies and fabrications by Armenians why should we even consider that what they say about Ottomans could be true?
The archives are open, all they're asking for is Armenian and international historians to come forward and investigate the claims. They want the Armenians to open up their archives, what is so wrong with that?
Why don't the Armenians open up their archives to this very day? Why? If they so desperately want to prove a genocide happened and if they're so convinced it did happen? Then why? I just don't understand...
Why have they changed the number of people dead from 4 million to 600k then back to 1.5 million again? It is
proven that there were only roughly
1.5 million Armenians who used to live in Turkey at the time. These figures come from International sources like Encyclopedia Britannia and the French Yellow Book and numerous others. Why should something that has obviously been fabricated not be investigated?
It's not a matter of why should we believe them, it's a matter of come and see for yourself. Turkey can't lie about this one I'm afraid, not when they're offering for international historians to investigate it, if they wasn't fair enough I would be suspicious also.
It's not even a matter for just Turkish and Armenian historians, a lot of people will need to get involved such as the Russian historians because their archives contain a lot of information on the Dashnak rebellion movements.
If you were to read about it properly then you would understand Turkeys stance on the issue.