Cyprus-Forum.com

[The Cypriot]

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/unit ... index.html

[zan]

Which side will it belong to and who is going to police it. Could it be seen to be giving land to the RoC by the back door?

[bill cobbett]

If I were a citizen of Nicosia I would sign this one - a bold move.

[shahmaran]

im not signing it! it smells fishy!

[Pyrpolizer]

Which side will it belong to and who is going to police it. Could it be seen to be giving land to the RoC by the back door?

Ha,ha, ha. Slowly but steadily you reveal what is really behind your partitionist views. Land! Stolen land!

Anyway if that would make you feel better the land in north of Nicosia was traditionally owned by the TCs. What was not TC owned was in 1960 bought by Kucuk using the money he got from the British in settlement of some areas in Varoshia. There is some very little land some of it belonging to GCs some to TCs in the buffer zone though. I think the buffer zone there is only one street wide.

[bill cobbett]

What can be fishy about this brave move to a demiliterised zone, which will need the same levels of concessions and trust from both communities - What can be suspicious about desiring the the end of the division of "Europe's Last Divided City"?

[zan]

Which side will it belong to and who is going to police it. Could it be seen to be giving land to the RoC by the back door?

Ha,ha, ha. Slowly but steadily you reveal what is really behind your partitionist views. Land! Stolen land!

Anyway if that would make you feel better the land in north of Nicosia was traditionally owned by the TCs. What was not TC owned was in 1960 bought by Kucuk using the money he got from the British in settlement of some areas in Varoshia. There is some very little land some of it belonging to GCs some to TCs in the buffer zone though. I think the buffer zone there is only one street wide.

You really are not very good at this are you You just keep on thinking that we and the Cyprus problem do not exist and we shall see how far you get. For Your information there is conflict over the boarder and no one has given way. My question was about who will finally give way and open a long stretch. Perhaps I should explain it to you a bit simpler because you simply can’t get the idea.....


Imagine a line. Either side of the line there is two hostile men. (How are we doing so far) One says to the other lets put a doorway in that line so that we can cross over and see each other. They both agree and do so. Then one says, lets open a road that is twenty feet wide and it stretches a quarter of a mile into my land and the same in your land. This part is now in no mans land. The line has been distorted. (I hope you are keeping up) If the man in the south claims it as his own that that is an encroachment into the other mans land and visa versa. The big question is (you can take a break here if you like) who will police that no mans land so that there is not further conflict between the two. (OH! Your back) A simple act of unity could turn into yet more conflict. The UN could police that land but would that just not mean a widening of the boarder.


Chew on that for a while and see what rubbish you can regurgitate to prove my unstable intentions.

[Pyrpolizer]

You are so absolutely out of reality that cannot realise that the matter of policing the area has nothing to do with demilitirisation of the area.In fact the area is already policed and will continue be policed the same way it is now. The demilitarisation of the area does not mean the buffer zone will go, it will simply stay under the control of the UN as it ALREADY is.

The happy thing about it is that perhaps (JUST PERHAPS) people owing properties in the street that now constitutes the buffer zone might be able to get them back and revive the area. We have one example like that already in practice for 32 years. It is the PYLA village.

You are living in fears and dreams as always.

[shahmaran]

yeah who polices pile? its a cute little village..

[zan]

You are so absolutely out of reality that cannot realise that the matter of policing the area has nothing to do with demilitirisation of the area.In fact the area is already policed and will continue be policed the same way it is now. The demilitarisation of the area does not mean the buffer zone will go, it will simply stay under the control of the UN as it ALREADY is.

The happy thing about it is that perhaps (JUST PERHAPS) people owing properties in the street that now constitutes the buffer zone might be able to get them back and revive the area. We have one example like that already in practice for 32 years. It is the PYLA village.

You are living in fears and dreams as always.

So bit by bit you want to hand the island over to the UN Where will the crossing be? Will it still be in the middle or will they have to move those to the end of the street. Can you not see what I am asking? In whose jurisdiction will it fall under? If a crime is committed in the street which court will try the case. Where will the taxes be paid? Think man think.