Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Pyrpolizer** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:37 pm

He,he,he.
Tell these lies to someone who doesn't know. They don't mix at all???? Do you know that at the Greek side of the village most restaurants and shops belong to TCs? Go there see with your own eyes.

Even the municipality there is mixed. Yes there are 2 central kafene one TC and one GC in the center of the village but nobody is excluded to join if there is an interesting game of tavli or cards to join in.

by **cypezokyli** » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:03 am

shahmaran wrote:im not signing it! it smells fishy!

zan wrote:Which side will it belong to and who is going to police it. Could it be seen to be giving land to the RoC by the back door?

the funny thing is that when our goverment poses objections you come along to say, "look they dont want a solution" , "look they are nationalists"

when it comes to supporting the opening of the street , you see conspiracy theories.

anyway, had you known a bit about gc politics then it is crystal clear that tpap has nothing to do with such a moove and above all has nothing to gain from that.

if anything it would be the opposition to tpapthat would do sth like that... what they call in this side "those who support the turkish propaganda"

by **zan** » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:58 am

cypezokyli wrote:
shahmaran wrote:im not signing it! it smells fishy!

zan wrote:Which side will it belong to and who is going to police it. Could it be seen to be giving land to the RoC by the back door?

the funny thing is that when our goverment poses objections you come along to say, "look they dont want a solution" , "look they are nationalists"

when it comes to supporting the opening of the street , you see conspiracy theories.

anyway, had you known a bit about gc politics then it is crystal clear that tpap has nothing to do with such a moove and above all has nothing to gain from that.

if anything it would be the opposition to tpapthat would do sth like that... what they call in this side "those who support the turkish propaganda"

My question was quite clear in that it did not mean only the RoC would be seen to take possession of the area Cyp. If you have read the whole post then you would see that I said it might be an excuse for more conflict even though it is seen as a positive move by both sides. Can you at least answer my questions as to who is going to police, tax and claim that part of land. And did you read my postings of before.

by **Pyrpolizer** » Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:05 pm

You never listen.
I told you a hundred times the return of people is JUST A PROBABILITY.
It has nothing to do with what we are talking about. This PROBABILITY was just one of my side-comments.

Therefore here's is the answer to who is going to police the area:
The chief of snakes and rats.
Heres the answer of who is going to collect the taxes:
The tax collector of the ants.

DO YOU FINALLY GET IT?

:evil:

by **zan** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:17 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:You never listen.
I told you a hundred times the return of people is JUST A PROBABILITY.
It has nothing to do with what we are talking about. This PROBABILITY was just one of my side-comments.

Therefore here's is the answer to who is going to police the area:
The chief of snakes and rats.
Heres the answer of who is going to collect the taxes:
The tax collector of the ants.

DO YOU FINALLY GET IT?

No I am afraid I do not get it because it sounds so stupid. So ....you want to open an area that no one wants to move into "probably" just for the sake of it so that it "probably" looks like a gesture of good will and reconciliation "probably". No even I don't make sense to me any more. What was the point again?

by **Pyrpolizer** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:25 pm

You are such an idiot. The petition says this:

We demand that the city becomes a demilitarized zone with no weapons

And you are asking stupid questions like if it is going to me de-militarised who is going to collect the taxes and who is going to police the area….

How many times should I tell you the two ARE TOTALLY IRRELEVANT?