The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


NO T/C WAS KILLED BY G/Cs 5 YEARS BEFORE TURKISH INVASION

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby zan » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:05 pm

Kifeas wrote:
zan wrote: So now we have come to the 3% quoted but from a different angle. In theory and in Greek propaganda all of Cyprus was open to the TCs so the percentage you have quoted is less than generous for Greek propaganda reasons. You could have claimed that and you missed your chance. The reality how ever was that the GCs did all they could to stop the TCs from travelling or indeed stepping out of the villages so "being forced into the 3%"is more accurate and not how much was actually controled by. The only way TCs were able to travel from one area to another was by UN escort and as was reported the GC national guard were able to travel well into these so called TC controlled areas but not into the villages as such.

As usual, you talk nonsense again, but it is totally expected from someone like yourself! You cannot comprehend even simpler issues and stuff, set aside the above.



Hade bakalim! The oracle has spoken. :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Kifeas » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:07 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
zan wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Sure mosquito boy.
25,000 are one fifth of 120,000.
Therefore 4/5ths of the TCs were NOT in enclaves. Therefore the claim that the TCs were squeezed in 3% of the land ALL living in enclaves is A LIE.

Having trouble with your maths again pyro. No one said that the whole of the 3% were enclaves. You see and read what you want to read and and cannot even make them stop long enough in your tiny mind to make sense of anything.


Mosquito boy....another good one. :roll:


What were the 3% then if they were not enclaves? International Airports?
Sorry man, but most of the times you don't make sense.


VP, I ask you once more to show or name me one single area of the above map that is coloured in (light and dark) red, which was not part of an “enclave” before and up until 1974, or which was not controlled by TCs! Do just that, and cut the crab!
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Pyrpolizer » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:11 pm

Zan thinks it is the TCs who were not allowed to move freely all over Cyprus, and NOT THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
In fact if a GC would by accident fall in a TC area he would be lucky to get out of it alive.
Zan thinks it is TCs who needed UN escort to move freely whereas it WAS THE EXACT OPPOSITE. The GCs needed the UN escort to move, as it was the case of moving from Nicosia to Kyrenia. We had to travel all around the mountains for 1 and a half hour to do an 18 minute journey.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:12 pm

Kifeas wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
zan wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Sure mosquito boy.
25,000 are one fifth of 120,000.
Therefore 4/5ths of the TCs were NOT in enclaves. Therefore the claim that the TCs were squeezed in 3% of the land ALL living in enclaves is A LIE.

Having trouble with your maths again pyro. No one said that the whole of the 3% were enclaves. You see and read what you want to read and and cannot even make them stop long enough in your tiny mind to make sense of anything.


Mosquito boy....another good one. :roll:


What were the 3% then if they were not enclaves? International Airports?
Sorry man, but most of the times you don't make sense.


VP, I ask you once more to show or name me one single area of the above map that is coloured in (light and dark) red, which was not part of an “enclave” before and up until 1974, or which was not controlled by TCs! Do just that, and cut the crab!


Crap spelt with a p not a b which is something from the sea.

How can you be sure which areas were enclaves? that map is to old to represent the true picture of the events of 1963 onwards which chnaged where TCs were concentrated. You would have to find the villagers whos villages may have been coloured pink or red on your map but were they inhabited? that is another matter all together, many of their homes were burnt down. So cut the crap and stop trying to persuade people everything was rosey. They were difficult times for everyone especially TCs.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Pyrpolizer » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:14 pm

VP why don't you tell us what this 3% actually is and give us some maps to see it?
Is it something imaginary, something philosophical perhaps, something like what Zan wants us to beleive?
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:15 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:Zan thinks it is the TCs who were not allowed to move freely all over Cyprus, and NOT THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
In fact if a GC would by accident fall in a TC area he would be lucky to get out of it alive.
Zan thinks it is TCs who needed UN escort to move freely whereas it WAS THE EXACT OPPOSITE. The GCs needed the UN escort to move, as it was the case of moving from Nicosia to Kyrenia. We had to travel all around the mountains for 1 and a half hour to do an 18 minute journey.


Your complaining about a situaiton you created yourself. ironic.. :lol:
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Pyrpolizer » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:21 pm

Oh yes, I forgot it is our TMT fighters who actually builted one of the most heavily armed areas in the world inside the valey of Kionelli. It was our TMT "fighters" who were slaughtering any drank GC who might have lost his way and fallen into their snake nest.

EVERYTHING was the fault of the GCs! ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby zan » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:22 pm

VP'

Do you think if we showed them a map of today they would wake up and smell the humuz. :wink:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Jerry » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:23 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
zan wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Sure mosquito boy.
25,000 are one fifth of 120,000.
Therefore 4/5ths of the TCs were NOT in enclaves. Therefore the claim that the TCs were squeezed in 3% of the land ALL living in enclaves is A LIE.

Having trouble with your maths again pyro. No one said that the whole of the 3% were enclaves. You see and read what you want to read and and cannot even make them stop long enough in your tiny mind to make sense of anything.


Mosquito boy....another good one. :roll:


What were the 3% then if they were not enclaves? International Airports?
Sorry man, but most of the times you don't make sense.


VP, I ask you once more to show or name me one single area of the above map that is coloured in (light and dark) red, which was not part of an “enclave” before and up until 1974, or which was not controlled by TCs! Do just that, and cut the crab!


Crap spelt with a p not a b which is something from the sea.

How can you be sure which areas were enclaves? that map is to old to represent the true picture of the events of 1963 onwards which chnaged where TCs were concentrated. You would have to find the villagers whos villages may have been coloured pink or red on your map but were they inhabited? that is another matter all together, many of their homes were burnt down. So cut the crap and stop trying to persuade people everything was rosey. They were difficult times for everyone especially TCs.


"to old" should be spelled too old, "chnaged" is spelled changed, "whos" should be spelled whose, "that" should be That after a question mark, "rosey" is spelled rosy.

Hope this helps.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby zan » Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:30 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:Oh yes, I forgot it is our TMT fighters who actually builted one of the most heavily armed areas in the world inside the valey of Kionelli. It was our TMT "fighters" who were slaughtering any drank GC who might have lost his way and fallen into their snake nest.

EVERYTHING was the fault of the GCs! ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING.



And now they are in Iran teaching them how to build the heaviest armed resistance in the world with just 1000 people. Bring it on Bush they have the TMT on their side. You do not stand a chance. :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests