humanist wrote:I cannot understand what is so unnatural about a gay man rearing a child that he may have fathered to a lesbian or a straight woman who was in her 40's and not married.
Piratis I also do not understand what you mean by "that kind" of environment. I assure you that I am well respected social worker, own my home, I have the support of my parents, I do not use drugs and may have alcohol on very rare occasions, I socalise with teachers, lawyers, yoga teachers and artists. I do not have criminal record and I care for humanity as much as I do for the environment. I am not violent and yes I go to church evry now and then as I am more of a Bahai in my fath than anything else.
So please tell me what "that kind" of environment I am living in that t would not be condusive to raising a child.
Bananiot wrote:Here we go again:
Piratis saysI just say that gays having children is not something natural.
Inference: If it is not natural it is no good.
Point made: Please stop this absurdity. Just because something is not natural it does not mean that it is not good. This line of thought has created monsters and dictarors and misanthropists and basically all the scum of the earth.
Piratis wrote:Bananiot wrote:Here we go again:
Piratis saysI just say that gays having children is not something natural.
Inference: If it is not natural it is no good.
Point made: Please stop this absurdity. Just because something is not natural it does not mean that it is not good. This line of thought has created monsters and dictarors and misanthropists and basically all the scum of the earth.
You need to have a good reason for going against nature. And even in that case doing so should be done in a very careful way. Even medicine that can cure deceases pass from several levels of testing before they are given to people.
Those that go right away to test their ideas on humans without regard to human life are usually the dictators. Hitler and Stalin did that.
In the case of gay parents I: 1) Don't see a good enough reason for going against nature and 2) You can not use children as guinea pigs. You might believe gay parents can be fine, but your belief is a blind one. You didn't even answer to the issues I posted. You can't use children as guinea pigs to prove it, and maybe/probably be responsible for damaging the lives of many people in the process.
A same thing could be said about cloning. But at least you can make experiments with mice about that until you are absolutely sure the risk is minimal. Would you agree to go directly on human cloning just to satisfy some people that want to be parents?
humanist wrote:Well Zan my friend, I think that just goes to prove that we are all one and this squabling is benefiting no one, least of all us, all of us human beings.
I really enjoy hiking and being in nature and I have just started painting also. I go out dancing quite often and try to be expressive of my spirit and my soul. The rest of the ime I meditate and work.
Gwad I'm boring I love my boringness.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests