by Pyrpolizer » Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:18 pm
OK let’s continue
From what you said it is obvious that all your concerns arise from the property issue.
Well lets cut the property pie into some pieces to have a clear picture.
Before 1974 the TCs were about 120,000. Only half of those are actually refugeesithe rest are original inhabitants having their own properties at the northern part. So the property issue is a problem ONLY for those 60,000 TCs.
The GC refugees in 1974 were 180,000. Considering about 40,000 are from Famagusta, and that some another 50,000 will return under GC Fed State then the property issue remains pending for about 90,000 GCs
From those 60,000 TCs at least a quarter will be able to exchange their own properties with an equal number of GC refugees, so in the end we are left with 45,000 TCs holding properties of 75,000 GCs having on the average nothing to pay.
Paying rent is a logical social compromise, compared with the capitalistic approach of "get out of my property" go live in the streets.On the other hand think about to whom will they be paying rent? To a person who was practically outsted, living for yeeeears under terrible conditions, and who in the end will again pay the price of been deprived his own property for the sake of a solution.
So your conclussion that overall the TCs will be losing basically errs to the fact that only a fraction of them will be in difficult economic conditions, and hey the GC refugees who will still be deprived their properties will be double as many.
You talked about compensation for loss of use from the TCs. Absolutely not. You cannot ask for compensation from a person who was simply a victim of circumstances.The same way the TCs will not be able to ask for compensation for loss of use from GC refugees living in their homes.
Maybe Turkey will be asked to pay compensation or sued at EU courts, but that is not our bussiness.
Your image of the situation in SA is totally irrelevant. In SA the blacks were and are by majority illiterate. In fact one of their major tribes the Zulu were cannibals until the 50s. They need aeons to catch up. It is not the same with the TCs. Their education is equal to the GCs, they have no limits to catch up other than on a standard of living. Nothing else.
What would the alternative be? Stay as we are? Are the TCs hapy now, living in uncerainty, living in properties that don’t belong to them, in an isolated puppet state controled by the deep state with settlers coming almost uncontrollable? And what if Turkey enters the EU finally, how are the TCs going to deal with the property issue then? Agreed partition is absolutely impossible, so what are the alternatives? Dreams upon dreams?
I think I left out one point, that of the return of refugees. Think logically! Everybody says will return but how many do you think they will actually return? And if they return where are they going to stay? I tell you no more than 10% will return. And from those very few will live at their original houses. Most propably they will build houses somewhere else, either using money they already have or by selling exchanged property.
To summarise. Arithmetically the solution will be bitter to more GCs than TCs as far as the property issue is concerned. Politically it will be bitter only for the GCs.For the TCs it will be salvation. Safetywise the Tcs will be concentrated in the Northern part and administered by themselves.
NB. I forgot to mention the settlers. Yes those settlers who will finally stay will most propably be on bottom of the social ladder. The question is:At what step of the social ladder were they when they were in Turkey, at what step are they now? Some of them will catch up, some will move to Germany, some will stay here under difficult conditions. Kismet.