Pyrpolizer wrote:Kifeas wrote:zan wrote:Kifeas wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
Now you are talking sense and you have included many elements which would be acceptable to the majority of TCs,
Unlike Bananiot and most TCs in the forum, I always talk sense. Thank you!Viewpoint wrote: We have absolutely no problem living with GCs or do we wish to force Kemalism or Religion on anyone,
You did seem to have a problem accepting that you will have to live and share the north with Greek Cypriots, and you did try to force Kemalism on those GCs wishing to return and live in the north; and both of them were very profoundly manifested in the way the Annan plan turned out to have been, adding in this way another one reason among those that compelled the Greek Cypriots to reject it. Now you have the audacity to shamelessly try and blame the Greek Cypriots for having rejected it!
To you any thing that remotely has links to be Turkish is Kemalism so how can we win with you any shape or form. Nothing short of converting to Helenism is good enough for you when most of us TCs are happy to leave you as you are.
Zan, how many times need I see that I wish no discussion with brainwashed idiots of low IQ like your self?
This guy is a declared Turkish Nationalist and partitionist, no wonder why he was kicked out in the 60s. What do you think he is doing here?
Pyro, I do not agree with your proposition that he may or should have rightfully been kicked out of somewhere in the 60's; neither do I know or think he was in fact been kicked out of anywhere -in the sense and substance in which he may have tried to present it.
My issue with him is not that he is a Turkish nationalist, or that we may disagree with each other, but that he cannot have a proper discussion on any subject relating with the Cyprus issue, because he is clueless, confused and aimless, and that he puts no effort in trying to learn, understand and think outside the box, but only on how to throw unrelated, meaningless and empty slogans and clichés around, for the sake of saying something and just to shoot (as he believes) someone else’s argument. His reactions and responses are mainly instinctive and sloppy, and almost never or very rarely logical and concise.