In 1960, Makarios was forced to sign the 1960 agreements since the only "alternatives" were continuation of colonial rule or a partition imposed by the British.
(for details see this movie: http://media3.filewind.com/g.php?filepath=1624 )
Of course we didn't like those agreements, and Makarios had asked for amendments before he signed them, but they were all refused to him.
In 1963 Makarios made proposals for the modifications of those agreements, and the Turks tell us that if we didn't like the agreements we shouldn't have sign them and that we had "hidden agendas" etc.
Fast forward to 2004, and the AngoAmericans are again trying to force on us their plan.
So I am asking you: When we clearly say that this plan is unfair and we don't want it why do some insist on trying to blackmail us and force it on us?
So when we will later (naturally) ask for modifications to try and bring that thing in accordance to the EU acquis and to remove its racist and separatist provisions to tell us that if we didn't like it we shouldn't have signed it, and start killing us and ethnically cleansing us will then again be justified because we dared to demand what every other EU citizens has and what it exists in every other country?
What we want is a democratic Cyprus without borders and racist discriminations and not the Annan partition plan. Therefore we will follow your advice and not sign what we do not accept.
So why some insist on trying to force Annan plan on us? Shouldn't they just say "if you don't like it, don't sing it"? Or this can only be said after they manage to force us to accept what they demand?