MicAtcyp wrote: I propose the same thing instead of "using foreign judges" after a solution.
Erol wrote: Sure because we all know what happened the last time GC AGREED to having a foreign judge as head of the RoC supreme court! Oh you do realise your 'constituion' still stipulates such a foreign judge don't you?
Erol, what’s your problem man? Do you find my proposal logical and binding for everyone concerned yes or no? If yes then what’s that got to do with what you are saying?
***************************************************************************
Alexandros wrote: MicAtCyp, you sound uncharacteristically optimistic, only a couple of weeks ago I remember you saying that you do not see further negotiations leading anywhere ...
Alexandre, if I remember well I just answered to a very specific question of yours telling you that any further negotiations ON the Anan Plan would lead to nowhere.
The new developments are that there will be a new plan, that will include some very few elements of the Anan plan. I think everybody with a mature political mind can understand how events roll following "journalistic rumours" from so called "reliable sources".So point No 1: a new plan. Judging from Papadopoulos refusal to write a new letter to Annan you can also predict where the new plan will come from.
In addition to that I mentioned that there will be a new more secured arbitration procedure directly from the EU utilising specialists on each and every issue separately.I don't remember where I read that, but thats again from the sort of "reliable sources" etc.
So yes I am rather optimistic that between March 2005 (after the TC elections and eventual kick off of Denkta$h) things will start "rolling". Now what makes me "almost sure" this procedure will lead to a solution? Simple. Because with such a procedure, there is no way out for anyone, no room for excuses, and no room for crunching out the time without producing results. Either you produce results or some committees of experts will produce them for you. Either your name is Papadopoulos ot Talat or Gul or whatever....
The only possible cloud I see is that for various reasons this procedure (mainly due to Turkey) may not start immediately after March or even delayed or postponed up untill 2006. I am optimistic though that once it starts it will lead to a sulution.
I hope I ‘ve cheered you all up with some flare of optimism.
******************************************************
Bananiot wrote: He has rejected plans that were miles better than the A plan.
Like which?
Bananiot wrote: There is a chance for a solution but only if Papadopoulos agrees and specifically pinpoints the changes (which must be kept to a minimum) to the plan he wishes which will not alter the philosophy of the plan and of course can be accepted by the other side. Does anyone seriously see Papadopoulos doing this?
No! The only one I see doing this, is you. Keep murmuring.....