The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


‘I didn’t know it was Greek Cypriot property’

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

‘I didn’t know it was Greek Cypriot property’

Postby joe » Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:15 pm

‘I didn’t know it was Greek Cypriot property’
By John Leonidou

A RUSSIAN woman buying a property in the north did not know it was actually owned by Greek Cypriots, a Nicosia court heard yesterday.

The trial of Elena Mirkushova, 30, accused of illegally purchasing a house built on land belonging to Greek Cypriot refugees, yesterday began with the investigator of the case taking the stand.

Yesterday’s proceedings were followed by Theodora Antonis Polycarpou, Marios Antonis Polycarpou and Andreas Antonis Polycarpou, the Greek Cypriot owners of the land sold to the woman by Turkish Cypriot estate agents.

Mirkushova was arrested at the Ledra Palace checkpoint in Nicosia on November 18, along with a Latvian friend of hers, after customs officers discovered a contract of purchase for a property in occupied Lapithos, as well as advertising pamphlets for properties in the occupied areas, in her bag.

Addressing the court, CID Constable Costas Costa said he had taken a statement from Mirkushova who confessed to buying the property in the north.

“However, when asked if she knew that the property originally belonged to Greek Cypriots, she said she was conned by the Turkish Cypriot estate agents because they never told her who were the original owners of the land she was buying.”

The investigator told the court that Mirkushova had signed the contract of purchase and had paid £1,000 sterling as a down payment for the house, which was being sold for £78,000 sterling.

According to the contract, Mirkushova would then have to pay £14,600 sterling a few months later and then pay off the rest of the amount in £2,500 sterling monthly installments.

“The defendant told us that she had not yet actually decided to buy the property but had wanted to go back to Russia so that her lawyers could go over it for her,” said Costa.
The court heard how Mirkushova had wanted to buy the house in the north “because she thought it would have been a good investment for her daughter.”

Evidence was also submitted to the court by the investigator, who handed to Judge Lemonia Kaoutzani various police statements, the contract of purchase and the advertising pamphlets for the properties in the north.

The Russian mother was remanded in custody on November 18 before being charged with two counts of illegally purchasing a property in the occupied areas and conspiracy to commit a crime.

She denies both charges.
Yesterday, the prosecution also dropped the arrest warrant against 42-year-old Bulet Fikri, the estate agent who sold her the house, because “he is in the occupied area and it is not possible to arrest him.”
According to the first charge of the indictment, Mirkushova and Fikri conspired to commit a crime. The second charge stated that on November 18, Mirkushova purchased from Fikri a property that belonged to somebody else, which was being built in the Ayios Theodoros area of Lapithos.
The property sold is built on two plots, one which belongs to Panayiota Grigoris Polydorou and one which is shared between the three members of the Polycarpou family.
The charge said the accused had signed a document of purchase, dated November 18, 2006, but should have known that there was no consent from the rightful owners.
The trial continues of December 19, with the Polycarpou family as well as an official of the Land Registry Department to be called up as witnesses.
User avatar
joe
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 5:50 am
Location: I hail from the Republic of Cyprus

Postby DT. » Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:44 pm

Oh well....any other foreigners wanna play russian roullette?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby stuballstu » Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:38 pm

Legally the ROC authorities have to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that she has indeed committed a crime. If she has agreed to buy the land, subject to legal checks, then there is no case to answer as part of her legal checks will be to check the legal status of the ownership with the ROC land registry. Case then closed as she has not committed a crime. Because of the complications in Cyprus it is recomended to that potential purchasers check with the land registry in the ROC.

Interesting that the arrest warrant issued for a Cypriot has been dropped. Are they ever going to try and prosecute another Cypriot or is it easier to pick on the foreigners?
stuballstu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby elko » Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:14 am

stuballstu wrote:Legally the ROC authorities have to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that she has indeed committed a crime. If she has agreed to buy the land, subject to legal checks, then there is no case to answer as part of her legal checks will be to check the legal status of the ownership with the ROC land registry. Case then closed as she has not committed a crime. Because of the complications in Cyprus it is recomended to that potential purchasers check with the land registry in the ROC.

Interesting that the arrest warrant issued for a Cypriot has been dropped. Are they ever going to try and prosecute another Cypriot or is it easier to pick on the foreigners?


I am sure the attorney filed a "Nolle Proseque" for the Turkish Cypriot. That means the case against him is suspended. Otherwise the case against the Russian woman could not continue. If the T. Cypriot ever crosses to the Greek side, he can be arrested and the same charges brought against him. So what has happened is normal procedure.

Now a comment about the substance of the case: no matter what you say about the sovereignty of north Cyprus, you do not have the "suzerainty, control or mandate" of north Cyprus and therefore you cannot declare an act to be criminal in such a state. However in banana republics like ROC, this is all normal. If ever you manage to find someone guilty of such an offence and eventually he escapes to an EU country, you will not be able to extradite him. For obvious reasons, Greece can be an exception and if that person actually escapes to Greece, he more than deserves it.
ismet
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby Piratis » Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:56 am

no matter what you say about the sovereignty of north Cyprus, you do not have the "suzerainty, control or mandate" of north Cyprus and therefore you cannot declare an act to be criminal in such a state.


There is no state in the northern part of Cyprus. There is illegal foreign occupation and everything they do is illegal.

I would have called the "trnc" a Banana Republic. However even Banana Republics are legal countries and part of UN. So your illegal pseudo puppet state of Turkey can not even earn that title.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby MR-from-NG » Sun Dec 17, 2006 3:32 am

There is no state in the northern part of Cyprus. There is illegal foreign occupation and everything they do is illegal.


Absolutely. Everything in the north is illegal. In fact we could turn off the tap that supplies them their oxygen and that would be the end of these people that exist, well they exist but they do so illegally.

So watch this space, the time will come when that tap will be turned off.

Piratis, Kifeas and co.
MR-from-NG
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:58 pm


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests