Piratis wrote
stuballstu, RoC is voluntarily part of EU, and it voluntarily accepts EU laws. So in effect only RoC decides, and it volunatrily allows the EU laws as well. There is nothing contratictory in what I said.
So now will you tell me why you continue to involve EU in this, since you admitted it has nothing to do with it?
Piratis
You claim
Within the borders of RoC only RoC can decide what is legal and what is not
I have now proven it and you have just admitted that this is not true. The ROC does not have final say on wether EU laws are implemented in the ROC they supersede any ROC laws. You insisted that the ROC has full control over the laws of her borders which is not the case as i have quite clearly pointed out.
There is two reasons for this. I'll point them out for you as you are obviously failing to grasp them .
1 EU laws take precedence
2 The ROC government is not in control of the north and therefore have no say whatsoever in the laws passed there.
So in essence you earlier statement
Within the borders of RoC only RoC can decide what is legal and what is not
is completely wrong. I can't make it any clearer now.
Quote:
If they do, again I'll ask, Why dont they send GC policeman to GC refugees property and arrest anyone who has bought, owns or rents on this land. Would it be because they have no juristiction within that part of Cyprus?
It is because there is an occupation army of 40.000 troops in it. If I go with a gun in your house and point it at you when you try to enter, would it mean that you do not own your home because I do not allow you to enter?
You didn't answer the question. Is it because a GC policeman can not arrest someone in the North because they have no juristiction? Legally he can't thats why they can't. There is not 40000 troops on guard outside every GC refugees property. You are sounding rather silly now. It is not a question of legal ownership it is a point that you say
Within the borders of RoC only RoC can decide what is legal and what is not
and yet can not implement these laws because as i have stated previously they have no juristiction to do so.
The "commission" is illegal simply because it is not legal. To create a commission like that you have to follow the legal procedures. If you don't, then it is illegal. If every lunatic makes claims that he created "commissions" the government has to bother and say that they are illegal? Of course they are. If they are not let them show us the legal RoC documents that prove the opposite.
What a great arguement
It is illegal because it is not legal? Where does it say its not legal. Definition of not legal = illegal. Is it because you say its not legal. Where does it say in the eyes of the law that it is illegal? Point that out to everyone.
What legal procedures do they have to follow? The ECHR will ratify the property commission as a suitable method of local restitution. Does that mean that the ECHR is telling GC's to commit a crime and apply to an illegally formed "commission" to claim property restitution? One of the highest lawcourts in Europe telling people to break the law and commit illegal acts? Makes sense Piratis.
It is not about proving that something is legal, it is about proving something is illegal Piratis can you do that? Time to shit or get off the pan on this one Piratis you are clutching at straws.