Xenides-Arestis won 850,000 euros in her case against Turkey; it took some time to understand this judgement.
It appears that the ECHR still supports the idea of local remedies through the immovable property commission, just not in her case because she updated her claim to "just satisfaction", not only compensation or other kinds of settlement.
Anyway, they haven't rejected the immovable property commission yet.
Full story is here; http://www.reportfromcyprus.com/
Any thoughts?