turkcyp wrote:Sorry Kifeas but I guess you have not seen my last post where point 6 is editted.
This property commision should be changed so that it satisfies the ECHR.
p.s. I do not expect you to like any of these proposals because quite frankly all of them are aimed at strengthening TC sides hands in the solution table. So if you oppose any of them, I understand.
No, is not a problem for me personally whether I am opposing them or not. I am trying to figure out whether they are practical and truly implemental or not.
In other words you are saying ignore proposal no:6 and consider the one below for the purposes of the ECHR.
turkcyp wrote:6) Edit. The property commission will be responsible to TRNC courts, and make it compatible to ECHR demands. Change laws in TRNC so that every foreigner including GC can come and obtain property in north. If GCs apply to property board return them all of their land (minus the property that is already inhabited by others as residential, and property that is substantially improved) and pay the rest (the portion which is not returned back) to GCs as fair market prices (payment should not be made as giving them deeds of TC property in the south).
Therefore that means that “TRNC” should change it’s constitution and subsequent laws, which call all GC properties to belong to the “TRNC,” acknowledge that they in fact now belong to the original GC owners, wave out (cancel) all the title deeds that it issued for these GC properties, freeze all the on going transactions affecting these properties and take back from the current holders or all subsequent buyers all the title deeds that it has previously issued as well as the properties themselves.
Otherwise how will this property commission will be able to reinstate to all the GC owners their properties (except as you said those properties that are used as residences,) according to the ECHR requirements?
Is that feasible for the “TRNC” do such a thing?
