VP is a partitionist, he said that clearly, however sometimes he talks in terms of confederation i.e of disguised partition.
Read some of his 3000 posts and you will clearly see the standard essay structure
a)Preface. (if necessary)
b)Subject: The subject of the discussion manipulated to lead up to
c)Conclussion: That’s why we should stay as we are, or agree for partition.
The scope of VP in this forum is to pass the idea that it is possible to end up to an agreed partition. As if the Gcs are so stupid that cannot realise that by the minute the subject of negoiations is partition we immediately lose ALL the currently 37% occupied area.
VP is the exact opposite of those GCs who think the TCs can end up a simple minority in a unitary state. He thinks he can end up having his own legal state. He claims the number of TCs who aspire his views is increasing, and he may well be true, the same increase can happen among the GCs given the right circumstances. The problem is, such aspirations are not acceptable by the majority of the other side whichever that might be. VP fails to see that.
I hope this helps.
Here are some extracts from this very page. They are all the same, repeated over and over again upto 3000 times:
wrote: But I can assure I represent a large chunk of TCs with the same mentality who on paper know full well that there is just noway the two sides can even agree
wrote: We are incapable of agreeing a solution, because we do not want it enough to compromise the current status quo.
What did I tell you man? They are all the same.
