The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


$60m from US to get yes on Annan Plan!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

$60m from US to get yes on Annan Plan!

Postby Sotos » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:54 pm

A HIGH-ranking government official yesterday claimed that the US chanelled around $60m to non-governmental organisations and persons in Cyprus, without Congressional approval to sway Cypriot voters in favour of the Annan Plan.

The actions were also outside the legal procedures agreed with the Cyprus Government during the period of the Annan Plan.

Testifying before the Parliamentary Watch Committee investigating the use of US funds through UNOPS to sway Cypriot voters in favour of the Annan Plan, Planning Bureau chief Andreas Moleskis said that any country would view this as working against its interests.

Nicos Koutsou, deputy leader of the Evroko party, which asked for the investigation, told journalists that the investigation will spread to Washington. He said a Cyprus Foreign Minister representative was already there to find and bring back evidence for sums, which had not gone through the competent Congress committee, but were unused funds from US aid to other countries redirected to Cyprus.

"We shall work together with Congress so as to help it locate those diplomats and others who violated American law and discuss this issue with them," Koutsou said.

He stressed that the aim of the investigation was not to smear anybody’s name, but on the contrary to enable anyone to speak for themselves and set the record straight.

Tarnish

"We undertook this investigation because we were repeatedly challenged to do so by Disy and others, but those who challenged us now criticise us for trying to smear people," Koutsou stressed.

Accusations for trying to tarnish the names of those involved in the Bicommunal Development Programme financed by UNOPS/USAID were repeated at yesterday’s session of the Watch Committee by Disy MP Christos Pourgourides, getting him into loud exchanges with Committee chairman Rikkos Erotokritou, also of Evroko, and Nikos Koutsou.

Red Cross Honorary President and one of the longest serving personalities of Cypriot politics Stella Souliotou caused a sensation by her written testimony, in which she said that there was an attempt by the US to finance NGOs directly in Cyprus as early as 1998.





As president of the Cyprus Red Cross, Souliotou had been authorised by the Government to conclude and sign agreements with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) about the Relief Operation of Cyprus and she always did so working jointly with the Foreign Ministry and the Planning Bureau under the scrutiny of the Auditor General.

This changed in 1998 when UNOPS took over from UNHCR.

President Clerides renewed her authorisation, but UNOPS now wanted to conclude agreements with NGOs without the usual cooperation and auditing procedures.

Souliotou refused to cooperate in this and it was then agreed that UNOPS could finance NGO programmes directly, provided they were approved by a Steering Committee, composed of the Planning Bureau, Stella Souliotou and a representative of the American Embassy.

Later, the Steering Committee was bypassed with NGO programmes being approved only by procedures dominated by the American embassy in Nicosia.

According to a final evaluation report of the Bicommunal Development Programme prepared by Nathan Associates, Inc., a ‘Special Initiative’ grant was established permitting the beginning of a more directive programme that remained within the control of the US embassy. This development came about "as the possibilities for a settlement improved in 2002."

Responded

By 2002-2003, financing focused more on programmes for ‘peace and mediation’, the evaluation report said. It is also noted in the report that the size of grants to many NGOs in Cyprus, especially in the first three years of the Bicommunal Programme "appears excessive by most standards used by USAID and others."

UNOPS Programme Manager Andrew Russell, who took over in January 2004, has responded positively to an invitation by the Watch Committee to testify before it and has accepted to waive his immunity for this.

The Watch Committee President, Rikkos Erotokritou, announced that in view of Russell’s forthcoming testimony and in order to give the opportunity to Committee members to study the bulky documentation that has accumulated, the Committee will resume its work in a fortnight.


I believe this. I know about a bi-communal NGO that all of its GC members are Annan plan supporters and it is sponsored by the Americans.
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Postby souroul » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:34 pm

god damn. well its not because they care about either side, its because they want the cy problem out of their way.

oh well, they have to try harder than that, hehe.
souroul
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:04 pm

Postby Sotos » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:03 pm

How much lower the vote for yes would be without the $60m? What do you think?
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:10 pm

It would be the same Sotos.
Notice the financing started a long long time before the Anan Plan.Remember the bi-communal meetings the sceminars for conflict resolution etc.
I beleive souroul gave the best answer.All they wanted was the Cyprus problem out of their way. They were equally disapointed like us after they realised they made a total mess with the Anan Plan.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:30 am

Does anyone know what was the funding amount for the NO campaign? The OXI T-Shirts for the 12 year olds must have cost a pretty penny... :lol:
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby cypezokyli » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:07 am

on the topic :
1. i wouldnt be surprised if the americans paid someone. its not the first time they have done that. if some people did indeed receive money they should be punished.

2. it never seizes to amaze me, that we conviniently forget other financing procedures like ***ahem** the CIA money our goverment gets and refuses to tell to the people how the use it**ahem.
sener levent hat an interesting article on the topic yesterday (i will wait post it later)

3. koutsou up to now, has not really given any real evidence, but just using mac artyist methods is accusing any possible yes supporter. these are examples of people found on koutsous list , that they were denied financing!! (sevgul uludag is also included in mr koutsous list. he had only done 1% of what sevgul did for cyprus... :roll: )

http://www.politis-news.com/cgibin/hweb ... rticles&-p

http://www.politis-news.com/cgibin/hweb ... %CF%D5@&-P

4. in the literature, conflict resolution seminars are something that it is considered as a means for solving a conflict. in some countries they even helped the peace procedure. only in cyprus they have received such attacks (even as back back as in early 1990s) especially from people who didnot participate .

5. especially people like koutsou and the likes, how would they welcome finally a research on those who betrayed cyprus in 1974 ? people who made public speeches welcoming grivas back to cyprus ... the famous gladio money .....perhaps ? .....
Last edited by cypezokyli on Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby cypezokyli » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:22 am

cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby cypezokyli » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:48 am

double post
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby Pyrpolizer » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:40 pm

As for Koutsou, raised up as an orphan from charities of his co-villagers because his father was killed by the TMTs and ending up holding at least 5 University degrees, I beleive he really did much more than what would be expected for Cyprus.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby Bananiot » Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:15 pm

What a lot of rubbish! UNOPS paid about 500 thousand dollars to some organisations and probably the biggest sum was collected by Papadopoulos's wife. The list of people that received money from UNOPS is no secret and can be found in Makarios's Droushiotis site as result on the research he made on the infamous "ambient atmosphere" business. Of course, Koutsou, has made this deviation in order to take the lights away from the person that we know for sure has collected money (the receipt has been published) from the dreaded Brits, in order to run his campaign.

Koutsou was an EOKA B supporter. Pyrpolyser, he is all yours. No envy.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest