Hi Issy, Kikapu,
Issy - Pretty much agree with you. The GCs also need to realise that to unify Cyprus at some point we have to say 'yes' to a plan. That plan has to be a compromise with the TC community on matters that matter to Cyprus.
Kikapu - I'm still not 100% convinced of the conspiracy theory but it does at least make sense that perhaps this is what the EU wanted all along. Certainly it was predicted a while before the referendums that the GCs would say no, the surprise was the extent of the no vote which could have well been due to the media as well as other influences.
What I would like to see is if the UN, which it is claimed did not have a chance to address the GC public although even on their own website they have posted interviews with the Cypriot media which may or may not have been broadcast, had that chance to what extent would that have changed the result. There are few GCs who after analysing the plan in depth would change their vote, BUT there are a heck of a lot of GCs who voted no because of only one or two aspects of the plan which could form the basis for furture negotiations and this is often overlooked. Take for example AKEL's 'soft no'. This was dismissed as talk at the time but the point was AKEL had some issues with some aspects of the plan but was in principle in favour. As someone else pointed out in a referendum you either vote yes or no. If the question had been 'Would you like to see Cyprus Unified?' how many GCs would vote no? Yet their no in April 2004 is being interpretted in this way.