The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Land Registry Department

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby elko » Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:04 pm

Nigel,
I think you are missing the whole point.

If the Land Registry has registered the land/a share of it in your name, then you're in a very good bargaining position.


This is the crux of the matter. You do not get the land registered in someone's name simply by depositing a copy of the contract with the land Registry. If that was the case, you simply sign the papers for sale and get the title deeds in a very short time. This was not possible becausee the land was not divided at the time. It required permissions and so on. Hence the land is not registered in Ku's name.

Now you may ask why bother deposit a copy of any agreement with the Land Registry? The simple answer is that when for various reasons a direct sale is not possible at the time, like this one, the buyer protects his rights against the vendor. The vendor cannot put a mortgage or any other charge on the property without the permission of the buyer. What happens if the vendor refuses to sign the papers to transfer the title deeds to the buyer when this is possible? The buyer has the option to go to court and the court has the power to order that the title deeds are registered in the name of the buyer, this is called "Specific Performance" i.e. the court orders the land Registry to perform the specific order that the court issues. However, Chapter 232 Sale of Land (Specific Performance" Law specifies a certain time limit and after that the court has no power to make such an order. After this time limit, the registration of the contract with the Land Registry is null and void.

Is it possible to look up the latest version of Chapter 232 in the south on the Internet? I will try Google and let you know if I find anything.
ismet
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby nhowarth » Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:37 pm

Hi Elko,

You're absolutely right - I was being mislead by the statement in Kus first post where he said "The solicitor has deposited the contract signed by both parties to Land Reg. Dept. and says I am the legal owner". (The only way he could be the legal owner would be if the land had been registered in his name).

You can find details of the Specific Performance Law at: http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/citizenschart ... enDocument where it says:

"The deposit of the contract of sale creates an encumbrance, which expires within six months from the date of the contract of sale or six months from the last date of transfer specified therein. Where only part of the property is sold (a building site or field under division or flat, office or shop under construction) the encumbrance is attached to the whole of the immovable property until the issue of a separate title for the part so sold. This means that the encumbrance created shall thereafter be limited to the part of the property so sold. Until the issue of a separate title, the vendor may transfer his property subject to the contract of sale, which is deemed to be a mortgage on the property so transferred, in the name of the new owner (purchaser). The contract of sale is binding upon the purchaser. The vendor may also choose to mortgage the property. In this case, the contract of sale is deemed to be a prior mortgage (subsisting before the new mortgage)".

Reading the above, I don't believe Ku has anything to worry about because "the encumbrance is attached to the whole of the immovable property until the issue of a separate title for the part so sold"

> The vendor cannot put a mortgage or any other charge on the property without the permission of the buyer.

This has changed - the law now says: "The vendor may also choose to mortgage the property. In this case, the contract of sale is deemed to be a prior mortgage (subsisting before the new mortgage)". (There was another thread about this somewhere).

Regards,
nhowarth
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Erimi, Limassol District, Cyprus

Postby elko » Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:47 am

Dear Nigel,
Thank you for your explanations but my concern for Ku still continues. I have not been able to access the actual text of Chapter 232 and therefore it is impossible to give a definitive legal opinion on the matter. What you have quoted is useful information but it is only a summary of the relevant section and not the whole. Indeed it says :
The deposit of the contract of sale creates an encumbrance, which expires within six months from the date of the contract of sale or six months from the last date of transfer specified therein


Did the contract specify a time limit? I cannot envisage an open ended contract. Suppose the vendor does not do anything? Does that mean the buyer has to wait for 50 years or more? Obviously not if the contract has been drawn up professionally. If there is a terminal date as should be, then what is the implication of
or six months from the last date of transfer specified therein

I think this six months can be fatal for the purchaser.

Anyway, without having the full text of Chapter 232 in-front of me, I will not b e so sure and my fears for Ku will continue. Any chance of obtaining a full copy of Chapter 232 on the Internet? Here in TRNC we have all the laws and the recent High Court Decisions available on the Internet. Surely ROC can do this as well, no?
ismet
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby nhowarth » Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:43 am

Hi Elco,

Apart from the Constitution, I've not been able to find the laws of Cyprus online (in English).

I believe there's something on the Cyprus Bar Association's site at: http://www.cyprusbarassociation.org/ but the site doesn't seem to be working at the moment.

There's also a downloadable e-book 'Introduction to Cyprus Law' published by Andreas Neocleous & Co from
http://www.neocleous.com/index.php?pageid=167

Regards,
nhowarth
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Erimi, Limassol District, Cyprus

Postby kuchan » Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:17 am

Hi, Nigel & Elko

Thanks for all your effort to find such a valuable information which I am grateful. The link is wonderful which quote:

.................................................................................................
Deposit of contract of sale of immovable property

The Sale of Land (Specific Performance) Law

The deposit of a contract of sale at the Department of Lands & Surveys creates an encumbrance of a great practical importance on the encumbered property. The subsistence of such encumbrance prevents the vendor from selling or charging any such property whereas the purchaser may obtain a judgment from the Court directing the registration of the property in his name, if the vendor refuses or fails to transfer the property within the time agreed as per contract of sale.
........................................................................................................

There is no time limitation mentioned in the Sale of Contract to obtain a separated title deed.

I have contacted my lawyer to supply me more infor. as Paphos Land Registry requiries contract reference number etc. I have plan of the land and a document of the plot belong to the Developer but asll in cyprus language which I don't understand.

How to put quote is a box as you all have done?

Thanks again.

Best regards

Ku
kuchan
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: uk

Postby elko » Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:46 pm

Hello Ku,
I am quite a novice too with Cyprus Form but I can manage simple quotes but have not advanced to nested ones.

Simply copy and paste the relevant part, then select this part and click on "quote" button. Hope this helps.
ismet

PS: There is no known Cypriot language. The official languages of ROC as per the 1960 Constitution are Greek and Turkish.
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby kuchan » Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:13 pm

Hi, Elko & Nigel

I have called Paphos Land Registry. A young woman was so courteous to answer my queries after faxing her the details of the surveyed plan and the land registry document.

She confirms that there is no time limit for the separation and the developer has never put in any request for it to be separated.

My lawyer has not come back to me of my queries regarding all these issues.

The developer has not replied me of my last e-mail a few days ago.

I have seen the land from Google Earth. The main road from Latchi to Paphos is only less than a mile on the right.

Will keep you informed of any further development.

Thank you very much.

Best regards

Ku
kuchan
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: uk

Postby elko » Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:27 am

Hello Ku, any developments? The article below from Cyprus Mail today is an eye opener. http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/
ismet

Caveat emptor
By Leo Leonidou

THE PROPERTY boom on the island over the past few years has led to many buyers not receiving their title deeds as the authorities struggle to stay afloat, swamped with applications.

In September 1999, it had been announced that thousands of property buyers who had not received title deeds from the seller could now take their case to court after the Supreme Court ruled that the issuing of title deeds of immovable property without the seller’s consent was legal and constitutional and should take effect as soon as contracts are lodged with the Land Registry Department.

The situation affects both locals and foreigners on the island, who are facing the problem of negligence by sellers in issuing a separate title deed and transferring the property to the the legitimate owner.

At the time, lawyer George Coucounis, who won the Supreme Court case, had said:

“Now, buyers have the right to refer to provisions of law, irrespective of the time they have deposited their sale contract with the Land Registry. Buyers can now apply to the court to order the seller to issue separate title deeds for the property they have bought.”

But the problem has not been solved with the Supreme Court decision, as thousands of buyers know only too well. A British couple who bought an apartment in Nicosia four years ago are still waiting for their title deeds despite their contract promising their delivery no later than two years following the purchase.

“The situation is unacceptable,” Stephen Hughes told the Sunday Mail. “Every time we call, the developer keeps stalling, telling us they will be issued next month.”

This week, Coucounis admitted to the Sunday Mail that, “there is still a problem in the issuance of title deeds and this is due to the three parties involved in their issuance, the developers, the purchasers and the appropriate authorities.

“There is a significant number of developers who do not take the necessary action for the issuance of separate title deeds due to financial benefits, irregularities in construction and a variety of other reasons.”

He added that in certain developments developers failed to pay off mortgages on the property, either to finance other investments of theirs or because they were unable to repay, with the result that title deeds remained with the banks.

This is a possibility that seriously worries Hughes. He said others in the complex where he had bought were all in the same boat, despite properties being bought in full, without mortgages. But what if the title deeds are being held by the bank because the developer had not off his mortgage on the property? “What happens if the developer goes bankrupt and the bank takes the flats, despite all of them being paid for?” he asked.

The developer of the specific property insists this is not the case, saying his company pays off all its debts within two years.

He says the problem lies elsewhere. “The deeds have not been issued as we have not received them. They are with the Land Registry Department.”

He estimated it would be another four to five months before the deeds were released. “Everybody will get them in the end, so I don’t know why they are complaining,” he said.

But Chartered Surveyor and property valuer Antonis Loizou described the general situation as “extremely problematic”, saying he was actively campaigning for change.

“As a result of the property boom of the last three to four years, annual applications have increased from 7,500 to 14,000. The Land Registry Department and planning authorities simply can’t cope.

“The government is being asked to simplify the whole procedure and to reduce the red tape, but I don’t think they are listening and the problem is getting worse. If the international market learns of this, there will be huge consequences for the building industry in Cyprus, which is worth more than one billion pounds every year in overseas sales alone.”

He advised any prudent buyer do their homework. “If they want to sell the property on but do not have a deed, they should have a cancellation agreement in place with the developer,” he said. “This entails various risks though, for example a demand for capital gains tax or double transfer fees. It is not something I would recommend but is sometimes necessary.”

He said he was aware of cases where people had not been able to sell on their properties as they did not have a title deed.

According to Christos Ktorides, the Assistant Director of the Interior Ministry’s Town Planning and Housing Department, the delay in issuing deeds is caused by two main reasons. “First, there is a huge number of applications which need to be dealt with, and secondly, the problem lies with developers,” he said.

“They must receive certificates of approval for building work from the relevant District Office before they can apply for deeds. To be issued with a certificate, they must fulfil all planning and building criteria for their projects. Finding this problematic, they often proceed with building without a certificate of approval, meaning they do not receive the title deeds.”

Lawyer Coucounis agreed. “The most important reason why most of the developers do not take the necessary steps to obtain separate title deeds is that there are irregularities in the construction which they are not interested in rectifying,” he said.
“Also responsible for this situation are the town and planning authorities and the local authorities, who tolerate this situation. In order to deal with the problem, the government, through the House of Representatives, enacted a law for the legalisation of a significant number of irregularities regarding immovable properties purchased prior to March 24, 2005, valid for 18 months, until the end of September 2006.

“It is up to the government to extend the time period of the law. It enabled the legalisation of several irregularities but only to the point of the issuance of a certificate of completion of works, and not title deeds.”

He said that the law, which enables the purchasers to obtain separate title deeds for their properties, “provides for the appointment of an appropriate person to issue separate title deeds in the name of the vendor. In order for this to be done, legal action must be taken against the vendor for the appointment of a suitable person to issue the separate title deeds in the name of the vendor.

“From the issuance of a certificate of final approval and/or completion certificate, the procedure for the issuance of the title deeds can be initiated.”

He added that the procedure, “will be undertaken in the name of the vendor and all relevant applications will be signed by the suitable person appointed by the court in lieu of the vendor.

“From the moment the separate title deeds will be issued, the purchaser is qualified to bring legal action against the vendor, claiming the specific performance of his sale contract. In other words, the court will order the district officer to transfer and register the property from the name of the vendor to the name of the purchaser.

But “only the purchasers who have deposited their sale contract with the District Land Office can use these remedies,” he cautioned.

“This is why a purchaser is also responsible for the problems in the issuance of separate title deeds.”

The lawyer concluded by saying that, “if they do not make sure they properly secure their rights at the beginning of the purchase transaction through solid legal representation, they will certainly face problems later on in the issuance of the title deeds. It is important for them to deposit the sale contract with the District Land Office within the legally specified time limit and to obtain from the vendors a bank guarantee for the removal of the mortgage upon the land, if there is any, and for the issuance of separate title deeds.”

Such advice is little consolation for Stephen Hughes, who has done everything by the book, and is still waiting.

“Developers are building like crazy across the island and leading people up the garden path as promises of deeds rarely materialise. How can somebody build a block of flats, sell it on and yet still use it as security to borrow more money to build more flats to keep more people waiting for their deeds? They should not be allowed to start new developments abroad if they haven’t paid off their debts in Cyprus.

“This has been allowed to go on unchecked and has become general custom with no basis in legality. It deprives people of security of tenure. A deed should be a basic right of a property owner.”

His wife, Sarah, said the situation was so bad that, “it will put off people wanting to buy property on the island. We all want our deeds so we can pass them on to our children,” she said.

A spokeswoman at Laiki Bank said their policy was the same as all other banks and based on Land Registry regulations. “In order to take out a mortgage, a buyer must produce a title deed. If they do not have one, a sale contract will be assigned to the bank, so in effect, the bank owns the property.”

She added that, “it is the developer’s obligation to issue deeds, with the bank taking on the deed upon registration of the mortgage. If the developer does not have the deed, they must issue a title deed guarantee in favour of the buyer, who I advise to request sufficient security from the developer in the form of a title deed guarantee.”

So there you have it. Caveat Emptor: Let the buyer beware.



Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2006
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby elko » Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:28 am

Hello Ku, any developments? The article below from Cyprus Mail today is an eye opener. http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/
ismet

Caveat emptor
By Leo Leonidou

THE PROPERTY boom on the island over the past few years has led to many buyers not receiving their title deeds as the authorities struggle to stay afloat, swamped with applications.

In September 1999, it had been announced that thousands of property buyers who had not received title deeds from the seller could now take their case to court after the Supreme Court ruled that the issuing of title deeds of immovable property without the seller’s consent was legal and constitutional and should take effect as soon as contracts are lodged with the Land Registry Department.

The situation affects both locals and foreigners on the island, who are facing the problem of negligence by sellers in issuing a separate title deed and transferring the property to the the legitimate owner.

At the time, lawyer George Coucounis, who won the Supreme Court case, had said:

“Now, buyers have the right to refer to provisions of law, irrespective of the time they have deposited their sale contract with the Land Registry. Buyers can now apply to the court to order the seller to issue separate title deeds for the property they have bought.”

But the problem has not been solved with the Supreme Court decision, as thousands of buyers know only too well. A British couple who bought an apartment in Nicosia four years ago are still waiting for their title deeds despite their contract promising their delivery no later than two years following the purchase.

“The situation is unacceptable,” Stephen Hughes told the Sunday Mail. “Every time we call, the developer keeps stalling, telling us they will be issued next month.”

This week, Coucounis admitted to the Sunday Mail that, “there is still a problem in the issuance of title deeds and this is due to the three parties involved in their issuance, the developers, the purchasers and the appropriate authorities.

“There is a significant number of developers who do not take the necessary action for the issuance of separate title deeds due to financial benefits, irregularities in construction and a variety of other reasons.”

He added that in certain developments developers failed to pay off mortgages on the property, either to finance other investments of theirs or because they were unable to repay, with the result that title deeds remained with the banks.

This is a possibility that seriously worries Hughes. He said others in the complex where he had bought were all in the same boat, despite properties being bought in full, without mortgages. But what if the title deeds are being held by the bank because the developer had not off his mortgage on the property? “What happens if the developer goes bankrupt and the bank takes the flats, despite all of them being paid for?” he asked.

The developer of the specific property insists this is not the case, saying his company pays off all its debts within two years.

He says the problem lies elsewhere. “The deeds have not been issued as we have not received them. They are with the Land Registry Department.”

He estimated it would be another four to five months before the deeds were released. “Everybody will get them in the end, so I don’t know why they are complaining,” he said.

But Chartered Surveyor and property valuer Antonis Loizou described the general situation as “extremely problematic”, saying he was actively campaigning for change.

“As a result of the property boom of the last three to four years, annual applications have increased from 7,500 to 14,000. The Land Registry Department and planning authorities simply can’t cope.

“The government is being asked to simplify the whole procedure and to reduce the red tape, but I don’t think they are listening and the problem is getting worse. If the international market learns of this, there will be huge consequences for the building industry in Cyprus, which is worth more than one billion pounds every year in overseas sales alone.”

He advised any prudent buyer do their homework. “If they want to sell the property on but do not have a deed, they should have a cancellation agreement in place with the developer,” he said. “This entails various risks though, for example a demand for capital gains tax or double transfer fees. It is not something I would recommend but is sometimes necessary.”

He said he was aware of cases where people had not been able to sell on their properties as they did not have a title deed.

According to Christos Ktorides, the Assistant Director of the Interior Ministry’s Town Planning and Housing Department, the delay in issuing deeds is caused by two main reasons. “First, there is a huge number of applications which need to be dealt with, and secondly, the problem lies with developers,” he said.

“They must receive certificates of approval for building work from the relevant District Office before they can apply for deeds. To be issued with a certificate, they must fulfil all planning and building criteria for their projects. Finding this problematic, they often proceed with building without a certificate of approval, meaning they do not receive the title deeds.”

Lawyer Coucounis agreed. “The most important reason why most of the developers do not take the necessary steps to obtain separate title deeds is that there are irregularities in the construction which they are not interested in rectifying,” he said.
“Also responsible for this situation are the town and planning authorities and the local authorities, who tolerate this situation. In order to deal with the problem, the government, through the House of Representatives, enacted a law for the legalisation of a significant number of irregularities regarding immovable properties purchased prior to March 24, 2005, valid for 18 months, until the end of September 2006.

“It is up to the government to extend the time period of the law. It enabled the legalisation of several irregularities but only to the point of the issuance of a certificate of completion of works, and not title deeds.”

He said that the law, which enables the purchasers to obtain separate title deeds for their properties, “provides for the appointment of an appropriate person to issue separate title deeds in the name of the vendor. In order for this to be done, legal action must be taken against the vendor for the appointment of a suitable person to issue the separate title deeds in the name of the vendor.

“From the issuance of a certificate of final approval and/or completion certificate, the procedure for the issuance of the title deeds can be initiated.”

He added that the procedure, “will be undertaken in the name of the vendor and all relevant applications will be signed by the suitable person appointed by the court in lieu of the vendor.

“From the moment the separate title deeds will be issued, the purchaser is qualified to bring legal action against the vendor, claiming the specific performance of his sale contract. In other words, the court will order the district officer to transfer and register the property from the name of the vendor to the name of the purchaser.

But “only the purchasers who have deposited their sale contract with the District Land Office can use these remedies,” he cautioned.

“This is why a purchaser is also responsible for the problems in the issuance of separate title deeds.”

The lawyer concluded by saying that, “if they do not make sure they properly secure their rights at the beginning of the purchase transaction through solid legal representation, they will certainly face problems later on in the issuance of the title deeds. It is important for them to deposit the sale contract with the District Land Office within the legally specified time limit and to obtain from the vendors a bank guarantee for the removal of the mortgage upon the land, if there is any, and for the issuance of separate title deeds.”

Such advice is little consolation for Stephen Hughes, who has done everything by the book, and is still waiting.

“Developers are building like crazy across the island and leading people up the garden path as promises of deeds rarely materialise. How can somebody build a block of flats, sell it on and yet still use it as security to borrow more money to build more flats to keep more people waiting for their deeds? They should not be allowed to start new developments abroad if they haven’t paid off their debts in Cyprus.

“This has been allowed to go on unchecked and has become general custom with no basis in legality. It deprives people of security of tenure. A deed should be a basic right of a property owner.”

His wife, Sarah, said the situation was so bad that, “it will put off people wanting to buy property on the island. We all want our deeds so we can pass them on to our children,” she said.

A spokeswoman at Laiki Bank said their policy was the same as all other banks and based on Land Registry regulations. “In order to take out a mortgage, a buyer must produce a title deed. If they do not have one, a sale contract will be assigned to the bank, so in effect, the bank owns the property.”

She added that, “it is the developer’s obligation to issue deeds, with the bank taking on the deed upon registration of the mortgage. If the developer does not have the deed, they must issue a title deed guarantee in favour of the buyer, who I advise to request sufficient security from the developer in the form of a title deed guarantee.”

So there you have it. Caveat Emptor: Let the buyer beware.



Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2006
elko
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 9:27 am

Postby pantheman » Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:12 pm

Hello Ku,

I think i identify your situation. I have something similar, so here goes;

Buying a share of a plot is possible and it is not section off. It has a name (excuse the spelling) its called "moushterekiko".

What it means is you have a share, you should get title deeds for the share (it won't say where this share is but within the 40000 m2 and you will own a fraction of it.

Now, you cannot build on this share until it gets broken up into plots, because no one knows which part is your!

To do anything with the plot you need to get the agreement of all those people that own a share, bloody nightmare if you ask me. It would seem you do not know if the deleoper has sold on more shares to others too!

It seems to me that the developer has bought the land cheap on the understanding it may change it zone type, but has yet to change. I would suspect that if he is trying to get it back he may know something you don't, and the reason he comes to you with such an offer coz now you have him, he needs your approval to do anything with it.

Having said this, you should have had your title deeds or at least some documents to that effect.

In my case, we bought a plot, before we uderstood the meaning of the term moushterikiko, and 30 years down the line its still there. Unfortunately, various zonal chages have taken place and now we can't do much with it, so i am having to chase the other parties to get together and discuss with the local municipality what we can do. What has made matters worse, the one party who owns 1/2 donum, has died, i austarlia and how the hell do you get in touch ???

I still endeavour. Sorry to hear about you case. The first thing i would do is get the title deeds or similar, see what the land value is as a building zone and if you want to get out of the rat race you may wish to sell back to the developer at market value rather than him buy back + interest and him pocket the profits.

Hope this helps

Pantheman.
User avatar
pantheman
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:21 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests