elko wrote:
Do you remember "Acheson Plan"? Turkey was to be given a base in Karpasia but GCs refused. Later in 1974 after the first cease fire, Turkish Cypriots asked for a number of "Turkish Cantons" and again refused.
And why giving the entire Karpasia to Turkey as a base, and Enosis of the rest of Cyprus with Greece, as per the Acheson Plan, was a missed opportunity?
As for the above 1974 proposal, it was made not by the TCs -Denktash was insisting on a single area of 34% along almost the same line that was later occupied, from Lefka to Famagusta; but was made by Gunes -FM of Turkey, in Geneva on the eve of 13-14 of August 1974. It was indeed a “Cantonal arrangement,” again equal with 34% of Cyprus, but it was not rejected as such but Klerides. Instead, he asked for a 36 hour period to consult with Makarios and other GCs, and then to reply. Gunes cynically said to him: “A yes or a no, now!” Mavros -the FM of Greece stood up and said to the discussion panel that: “what we see now is a comedy being played in front of our eyes, because Turkish troops are about ready to commence a second invasion, if they haven’t started yet as we talk!” Gunes left the discussion room immediately and called Ecevit to whom he said: “Ayse may go on vacation,” signalling in this way the beginning of the second Turkish assault. As a result, you now occupy 36% of Cyprus illegally, whereas had Klerides accepted Gunes’ proposal, you would have occupied 34% of Cyprus legally -with our signature.
The truth of the matter was that the Cantonal arrangement that was proposed by Turkey would have been much better for Turkey, as it would have brought the entire of Cyprus under its domination (large Turkish military bases /cantons on the coast lines around Cyprus, i.e. Pafos, Larnaka, Famagusta, Lefka, Karpasia, plus the entire area of North Nicosia /Kyrenia that was occupied during the first phase and Cease fire,) but it would have been much worst for the TCs since they would have remained fragmented in 6 different areas of Cyprus, without direct access from one area to the other.
Do you know what Callahan (British FM) said in a statement after all the above and the collapse of the Geneva talks on the evening of the 13 of August 1974?
elko wrote:
Would you care to explain this apparently nonsensical statement please?
Ismet
If you explain to me your own nonsensical statement regarding us begging for the Annan plan, perhaps you will also understand what I have meant with mine.