The Orams (and all the crooks in the north, British and TCs alike) have won absolutely nothing, even from such a politically motivated decision(see relevant thread) of the British High Court! In fact, they lost more than they thought they could have claimed so far! The same applies to the Turkish propaganda allegations!
The Turkish propaganda alleges that the Turkish invasion was not an invasion but instead a peace operation, that the north is not under Turkish occupation, and that there was no ethnic cleansing of the GCs from this area of Cyprus. Yet, in the Orams v. Apostolides judgment which they celebrate so fervently, the above realities are fully accepted and adopted by the British high court, contrary to the Turkish propaganda claims. In a sense, what they celebrate is the defeat of their propaganda allegations, together with their temporary achievement to get away with illegalities.
In paragraph 3 of the judgment, the court accepts that “On 20 July 1974 the Turkish army invaded the north of the island ….” The court further accepts that One outcome of this was the effective expulsion of Greek Cypriots from much of the area that was occupied.” Therefore, it was not a peace operation as the Turkish propaganda tries to paint it, but it was an invasion, an occupation and an act of ethnic cleansing (“expulsion of Greek Cypriots from much of the area that was occupied.”) Yet, they celebrate the judgment!
Furthermore, in paragraph 31 of the above judgment, the British high court finds that:
"I do not think that the case for Mr and Mrs Orams on this aspect of the appeal can be put in any other way. The land is within the Republic of Cyprus. There is no conflict with Article 22.1 of the Regulation. It is not within the territory of another Member State. The cases in the European Court of Human Rights show that the laws of the TRNC cannot be relied on by Mr and Mrs Orams to deprive Mr Apostolides of his title to the land. In any event that would involve a review of the substance of the judgment of the District Court of 19 April 2005, contrary to Article 36. So on these matters I accept the submissions of Mr Beazley."
Basically, what the Orams are celebrating is not their vindication as to whether what they did was an illegality (trespassing,) or not, or that Apostolides is not the real owner of the property in which they built their villa, but they are celebrating the fact that their act will remain (temporarily) with impunity. They were not vindicated morally, and they were not cleared out legally. They just got away with impunity for the time being, and this is what they celebrate.
The Orams have won absolutely nothing! In fact they lost more than what they thought they had before! Not just the Orams, but more importantly all the crooks in the north that illegally "sell" GC properties to foreigners, and those "buying" them, because now it is also verified by a British court ruling that what they do is illegal, and that now the notorious UK government under Tony Blair will also be required and obliged to amend its notorious travelling advise to its citizens considering to "buy" GC properties in the north, and make it more explicit, in accordance to the findings of the British High Court in paragraph 31 of the Orams judgment.