It seems to me that’s not a debate but rather publishing of letters. Such things presented to ignorants like the vast majority of British readers allows for too many lies. In fact the NO reply consists of 5 lies all of which together make 90% of the text.
1.
wrote: The first few days were taken up with settling old scores between themselves, then they turned on the outsiders.
2.
wrote: In 1975, the Greek Republic Government asked for claims to land left behind in the North. The resulting claims answers amounted to property three times the size of the whole island. The end result was that Turkish property in the south was given to Greek refugees from the north.
3.
wrote: Many Turks were driven from their homes and busineses to the north where they were allocated land in lieu of what they had lost in the south.
4.
wrote: When the Turkish side later allowed the Greeks re-entry to the north, the government decided that if a northern property were to be reclaimed, the allocated property on the south should be forfeited.
5
wrote: There weren't many takers, however, because, 30 years on, the Greeks had developed much of that land.
