erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote: Why do you ask these questions?
Because I am trying to asses the feasibility of such a sale. The value of this land to anyone depends on what chance there is of the buyer being able to use that land - which in turn relates to the questions I have asked.
Ok, but this not what we have agreed. We have agreed that you will provide a buyer who is willing to pay a decent price fro my land and I will take care of all the title deed transfers through the RoC. You disputed my ability to finalise the sale and I bet with you that I can in fact conclude the transaction with the RoC provided that you find me a sincere perspective buyer. You seemed to certain that you could find a buyer and you had doubts that I could complete the title deed transfer. Now it seems that we have exactly the opposite situation.
erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote:I am accepting only the laws of the RoC. Whatever the “TRNC” did or does is none of my business. For me and for the RoC any transaction authorised by “TRNC” is illegal. Is like it has never existed. Remember, we are talking about a transaction under the jurisdiction of the RoC. Even if I want to, I cannot commit any transaction under the “TRNC.” “TRNC” doesn’t “recognise” me as the legal owner of this land anyway, set aside to accept my right to sell it.
I understand all of this, but what matters to you as the seller is not the same as what matter to the buyer. WHat matters to the buyer is will they be able to use this land they buy from you under RoC law here in the TRNC or not. What the cost may be and the chance of sucsess may be of any necessary legal action they take here to enusre their use of the land. If the chance of them being able to use tha land here is zero, or the cost of persuing legal avenues to secure use of the land here is prohibitavely high then obviously finding a buyer will not be possible. So I understand your postition as a seller I would hope you woud understand the position of the buyer in any such proposed transaction.
Ok, but I suppose it was your obligation to take all these into consideration before challenging me that you will find me a buyer in order to prove to that I cannot conclude the sale through the RoC.
erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote:I thought it was clear what we were talking about, all along!
I am purely thinking of the practicality of what we were talking about all along. This depends not just on your position as the seller and the RoC view of such a sale but also the position of the buyer and the TRNC's view on such a sale. If a sale is ever to happen then all of these need to be understood and assesed.
Same answer as above.
erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote:We are talking about my right to sell this land (my land) according to the only legal title deeds, thse issued by the RoC, and which are the only ones I have in my possession.
We may have been talking about rights but I have moved on to talk about practical realites and not rights. Whatever you rights disputed or not a sale will depend on realites and not rights.
Therefore you admit that the real obstacle in me not been able to sell my property is not the RoC but the realities (illegalities to me and to the rest of the world) on the ground as they were created by Turkey and the "TRNC."
erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote:I claim that according to the RoC I have the right to sell my property.
Can I sell it though?
You can only sell it if there is someone who wants to buy it and this is true regardless of any political aspect.
Can you find me any GC property in the north that someone will be interested to buy from the legal GC owner at a decent price and not just for purely symbolic peanuts in order to double secure the ownership. If this is the case (which in fact is,) why any GC owner ever bother, I mean to sell his property rights for peanuts in order to white wash the thieve of his property.
erolz wrote:Kifeas wrote:I mean, can you find me a buyer or not?
That depends on many factors and not just on weather the RoC will 'allow' you to sell it. I can not tell you if I can find you a buyer. I can only do what I have already offered to do and that is investigate the matter futher.
Erol, why is it so difficult to admit that the whole issue is a nonsense and that in fact you cannot find any buyer and that the real problem is not the willingness of RoC or not (something for which I am sure I can deal with, anyway,) but the illegal confiscation of all the GC properties in the north and the arbitrary allocation to anyone that "TRNC" wished to do so, subsequently issuing illegal titles of ownership and facilitating further illegal transactions on these properties?