Viewpoint wrote: There is nothing wrong with the structure of the AP which is a BBF
Perhaps you don’t know that Talat in the presense of Kambari even refused the concept of BBF and insisted on a confederation of 2 separate countries. In the end, yes he yielded just because the UN representative was present.
wrote: One issue we agreed on was the Central Bank issues and usage of the Cyprus Pound
You must be joking. We never agreed on that. In fact we never accepted the final provision of 2 Central Banks, which means two separate monetary policies.
wrote: Another issue we agreed on was the number of settlers that could remain (45. 000)
We never agreed on that either. This provision was set in the Anan Plan despite our objection that we cannot accept more than 35, 000
including those who got married with TCs and including their children. The Anan plan increased the number to 45. 000, your side excluded from that those who were married, and presented a list of 45. 000 excluding their children so the final number was actually in the range of 100. 000 +. So where did we agree? ? ? ?
I repeat: If what was included in the Anan Plan was actually agreed, then we HAD NO REASON TO REJECT IT.
Look Viewpoint let me summarise you the Anan Plan to realise that we can never accept such a solution:
Governing system: A loose confederation, not A BB Federation.
Ruling: Totally impersonal, weak, with no authority whatsoever to impose decisions. A stateless State of 6 ministers…, a horrible and extremely costly law making process, a whole army of public servants.
Properties: GCs lose most of their properties.
Returning of GCs to their homes: Only the Famagustians could possibly return, and some elderly in other villages who would die soon anyway.
Settlers: All settlers would stay, possibility of even more coming.
Mingling of populations: No chance
Uniting the Country: No, it will be two separate countries in the form of protectorates of Greece and Turkey.
Security and demilitarisation: Totally flawed for upto 6 years, just bearable after 14 years.
EU Aquis: Totally in contradiction, risk of even been expelled from eU.
UN resolutions: trashed.
Economy: Totally collapsing, both Component states budget would always be in serious debit. The Federal State could not have a chance in a million undertaking the housing and relocating provisions of the Anan Plan.
These from just a quick memory review.
The only thing we agreed on the Anan Plan was the basic philosophy of a BBF in which the TCs would be ruled by themselves in a true Federation. We disagreed on ALL details that would make this philosophy a solution, that’s why the Anan Plan was rejected.
1) I repeat why your side does not enlist the issues where you said we had agreed in the past and carry on from there? Do you understand that by setting down the Anan Plan issues as the basis of negotiations that would mean a give and take on just those issues alone? And the final result could be nothing different than THAT plan?
2) I said it before and I repeat: Denktash spent 32 years wanting partition. Will Talat spend us another 32 years wanting disguised partition like the Anan Plan? Well it’s upto you to consider this. Because in the meantime the ones who pay are you the TCs and we the GC refugees. If we the GC refugees could do something, we would do it already…. It is you the TCs who have to act because, you don’t know what the next trick Turkey will invent to get rid of all of you. Who knows maybe they will decide to send all the Kurds there to solve the Kurdish problem! And don’t tell me Talat will pass a new law for visas. They can replace Talat any time they want.
wrote: Turkey turning its back on the EU will only make your EU leverage useless but end your hopes of any settlement, how will you pressurise Turkey to compromise? she will have no incentive and you will have no solution. If you cannot see this then you are blind and need to realign your thoughts
We are not blind nor stupid. If we let Turkey go through without oblidging we definetely lose, and rest all our hopes on the final date of her actual EU accession which btw may never happen. So if we are to exploit Turkeys EU road - which I repeat, odds are that will not end up to anything than a stong special relation - then we must use our weapons right now. Turkeys road has to be blocked very soon.
You tend to believe that Turkey will lose interest for the EU. I tell you Turkey
has no other option. I can explain this further if you want. Just look at my previous post regarding "OR" else option. Turkey owes too much money to the Americans, the Americans owe too much money to the European Banks,
the Americans act as the World Police on behalf of Europe they would never let Turkey become another headache for the World police "by letting her persue other paths". Do you now understand why we are not blind nor stupid?
wrote: rather than maintaining your stance that she is your enemy
But Turkey IS our enemy, this comes from current facts in Cyprus. It is an occupying force!
wrote: Turkey ever got in the EU she would be the 2nd largest country with a lot of weight
And this is exactly the reason Turkey will never become a full member. Ask the French and the Germans for further details. She will just end with a special relation….