It isn't. Considering ADSL goes upto 8mbit then no. I think their package means 2+. ie. you get ADSL, you get phone, you get crappy internet TV etc. You get more than one thing, with ADSL being one of them. Plus it does no harm to make it sound like the ADSL 2 which you get almost everywhere else that can go up to something like 23mbits.
Personally I think it is a lack of competition. Sort that out and everything would be a lot better. Right now I am paying £23GBP a month in the UK for 10mbit (with 0.5 or 1mbit upload I cannot remember which) broadband and that is probably a bit pricey right now tell the truth. Only reason I don't move is because I have had the same email address for the last decade, and the last time I changed from a long term address was a bit of a hassle (one I had in 1991).
When I move to Cyprus then 1.5mbit will be a bit of a come down, but it will be adequate for now. Hopefully they will sort themselves out sharpish, or start to lose out quite a lot when internet TV *really* starts taking off (esp. if MS get involved like they keep threatening). And no, 1.5mbit just won't cut the mustard for most SD shows, let alone HD.
256kbits was considered broadband in 1999
Can't remember when, but it wasn't long after that where, in the UK at least, they decided 256 wasn't broadband. ie. it didn't pass all the tickboxes for broadband. Can't remember if that argument landed on the broadband or not side, but it didn't really matter in the end as 256k was quickly relegated to your Gran's house in the shetland islands and quick phones/ PDAs.
And yes, it is a total pain that my parents use this speed in Limassol (for more than I spend on 10mbits) and conversations are only adequate with video conversations being pretty much unusable
Cheers