War Of Annoyances
BYEGM: 12/2/2004
BY OKTAY EKSI
HURRIYET- As the Dec. 17 European Union summit approaches, we are facing new annoyances. A draft statement prepared by EU Term President the Netherlands includes sections implicitly calling for the recognition of Greek Cyprus as well as proposals for ‘open-ended’ talks, permanent limitations on the movement of Turkish workers into EU countries, a ‘special partnership’ for Turkey instead of membership, and ending the talks if seen as necessary. These proposals aren’t well-intentioned aims for integration with Turkey. Instead they seek to discourage our membership bid or test our pride. What these proposals actually say is: ‘After you hang about for 10 or 15 years, we don’t want to see you as an equal member of the Union, but as modern servants to sweep the streets of Europe.’
It’s clear that this war of annoyances will continue until Dec. 17, where EU leaders will decide on starting our accession talks. I don’t say ‘whether to start accession talks,’ because the decision of the Helsinki summit of 1999 is clear: If we fulfill our duties, the way to our membership would be opened. It’s been over four years. First they wanted us to fulfill the short-term criteria in one year and the long-term criteria in three. We fulfilled all of them, and they confirmed this with a report. When we asked them whether anything remained to fulfill the Copenhagen criteria, some countries (especially France, Netherlands and Austria) started to be evasive. They proposed ‘special partnership’ for Turkey. French President Jacques Chirac’s attitude proposing a ‘special partnership’ is very disappointing. If you had such an idea in mind, why 43 years ago did you promise that Turkey would become an EU member after fulfilling certain criteria?
It would be terrible for the EU to maintain this stance, for they would be discriminating against a country which they promised equal membership. For it would mean they lack the honor to keep their promises.