"Pussy scanning" is been part of thes issues for generations.
Even i (being an example) have done that once or twise.
reportfromcyprus wrote:In my opinion, a lot of men completely miss the signals that women send that initiate sex.
If non-verbal and non-touch cues were included, the balance would change from 90-10 to 60-40, I think.
But a lot of time, they are subtle signs and include things like a look or coming closer than usual into personal space. Looking down instead of directly at you, etc etc. Even serving some one's dinner in a certain way can be a pass.
Kikapu wrote:andri_cy wrote:Kikapu wrote:Any given day, men can't help but look at a good looking woman with nice body and sex appeal. Within a few seconds, she will get a complete "cat scan" from top to bottom, and back to top again, with sexual thoughts dominating his mind. This will happen dozens times a day, and it doesn't matter if the wife or the girl friend is with him or not. It only takes few seconds, but he will do it. It is his "male sexual genetic blue print", and there's no escaping it. But man will also have sex on the mind, even if there're no women around to look at. They have their memories, some with the women they are with now, and some with their past experiences. It's a small wonder, how men can get anything done, when preoccupied by his "sexual blue print" that dictates his sexuality.
Oh please...I cat scan guys 24/7 . I dont think looking is cheating. I dont even think fantasizing about it is cheating. I believe cheating is when you actually go ahead and do it-that is if your partner disapproves. I dont think men are the only ones with sex on their minds. (And, ladies, lets be real now and admit that if a man is cheating most probably he is cheating with an OTHER woman so we cant be only judging men.) Once a while back I used to have this guy I worked closely with that I found attractive. I would never of course sleep with him as I am married, but I felt so bad, that I told my husband. He laughed at me... . The point is, I dont believe men or women have less or more temptations than the other. I dont even think at this point that they react to temptations differently. I think that sometimes women are unfair to men about that. I know more guys that were burnt by a woman than the other way around.
Andri_cy, do you ever sleep, if you're "Cat Scanning" 24/7 ??!!!! The above is not about cheating, it's about males appetite for women and sex.
I know you're a mother and a wive, but I would like to know from you, if you're willing to do it, and if you don't, that's fine also, whether you can tell us from your view or lets just say from women's view in general, just what do you get out of "Cat Scanning" a male, and what does that do to you. What are your thoughts during "Cat Scanning". Any information, intimate or not will be very useful to know, so that I can compare it with men's views.
reportfromcyprus wrote:In my opinion, a lot of men completely miss the signals that women send that initiate sex.
If non-verbal and non-touch cues were included, the balance would change from 90-10 to 60-40, I think.
But a lot of time, they are subtle signs and include things like a look or coming closer than usual into personal space. Looking down instead of directly at you, etc etc. Even serving someone's dinner in a certain way can be a pass.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests