Alexis
I am of the opinion that agreeing to partition is going to be just as hard as negotiating a comprehensive settlement to unify the island. In addition I believe a partitioned island is weaker than a unified one and in fact will not necessarily solve the problem in the long term as the two sides of the island will continue to be opposed to each other due to the resentment caused by an agreed partition. This logic says to me that Cyprus would be better off united.
Why? a clean break where we will be 2 good neighbours could even encourge stronger ties and working relations over time building trust and confidence. Forced union will only end up diasterously and worse than we are now.
The only problem with agreeing partition is the amount of land that will be returned to the GCs and the amount of compensation to be paid to Gcs for lost property if a clean breal is desired. I personally do not have a problem with GCs wanting to reside in the TRNC under our laws with us.
understand your stance vp, so don't get me wrong but it doesn't have to be GC majority rule there are plenty of methods that can be used to prevent the majority rule.
Try explaining that to people like Piratis, they just do not understand or comprehend this fact so the only other alternative is partition.
The GC community will not simply accept the plan for partition you outlined for the simple reason that their stance has always been for a unified Cyprus. They will push overwhelmingly for an 80:20 land solution as outlined by quite a number of GCs on this forum. My belief is that agreeing a partition will be every bit as futile as negotiating a comprehensive settlement based around unification.
Im pretty confident that it would be much simpler agreeing land return than a federal structure where GCs would want to dominate and have majority rule and TCs would fear being reduced to an insignificant minority.