Simon wrote:Kikapu says:
It's very simple. Absolute power corrupts, so for the benefit of the whole country, it is better to have checks and balances from both communities. Under normal conditions and situation, it could operate like any other Democratic country. The problem is, we have not earned each others trust yet, due to our very recent history together.
Kikapu, this is clearly a contradiction. If you are not a minority group and therefore not a separate group at all, then you would not need these very separate powers! We can have checks and balances; but if you are separating and distinguishing the communities; then you have to accept that your community is a minority in Cyprus, simple as that.
As a way of compromise, I would accept Kifeas' Plan.
Simon,
TC,s are a minority, but only in numbers and not a minority as a citizens of Cyprus, so that's why they reject to be protected only with "minority rights". Since the TC's have been grouped together now, for the last 32 years, naturally, they have also become a community. Being a community should not make them just a "minority" without any rights to participate in the decision making of the peoples business by the government, because foremost, they are Cypriot Citizens, before anything else (not including the settlers).
In any case, why split hair. You agree with the "Kifeas Plan", so lets move onto other pressing matters that Soto raised couple of posts back. I really hope, that we all understand, that Cyprus problems is not an easy problem to solve. Not with a "Unity Cyprus" or a "Partition". Each have their own difficulties, if we spend to much time arguing on every little detail. At some point, we will have to accept the best possible solution to benefit maximum number of Cypriot citizens, and do the very best to the rest of the citizens, to normalize their lives, as soon as possible. There's no magic "silver bullet". It's no wonder that the "Annan Plan" was pages and pages long, and I expect, the next one will be just as long.