Piratis
I respect your opinions and your right to express them however maybe in the future it would be advisable for you to not only read but understand what other member have written before responding.
stuballstu wrote
Quote:
Lets look at some facts shall we. The ECHR asked Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots to have a system of restitution for Greek Cypriot owned property
The Piratis response
You say you will talk about facts and you start with a big fat lie, as usual. Where did they ECHR ask Turkish Cypriots to make such system? The ECHR asked from Turkey to make it, since Turkey is the one that maintains the illegal occupation force on the soil od Republic of Cyprus.
A big fat lie?? Indeed not
ECHR asked Turkey to provide a "local" remedy to Greek Cypriot property claims. They in turn asked the TC government to do so (No one recognises the TRNC except Turkey as we already know so the ECHR could not aske them directly even if they wanted to).
Where is the lie??
Piratis wroteQuote:
Once this has been ratified by the ECHR then it becomes the "legal" or whatever you want to call it, course of any action to be taken by a GC. The ECHR will only get involved if the GC has applied to the property comission and and is not satisfied with the outcome.
First of all, the ECHR does not decide legality or illegality. It is a court about human rights. Secondly, the ECHR has not ratified anything, except if you have dreamed this as well? What the ECHR did, is make it clear that our human rights are violated by Turkey and that this should be corrected and Turkey pay compensation for the past 32 years and give back to us our properties.
Piratis you are either mis-informed or acting ignorant. The "property commission" has been borne to give restitution which can be in the form of compensation or giving the property back.
I am not sure if the ECHR has ratified the precedures for the "Property commission", maybe other forum members will be able to confirm this or not.
Piratis wroteQuote:
Now a TC applying to the GC for restitution has to meet many criteria.
Firstly they have to stay in the ROC government controlled areas for a minimuim of 6 months before the application can proceed.
If you ask me, no property should be given to any TC until they return the land they stole from us and they accept legality. They are the 18% and they illegally keep the 37%, why the hell should they get more?
How mis-guided can ones posts get? TC's never stole anything. How can they steal something of which they were partners of??? Is it back to the numbers game now? 18% of the population = 18% of the land does it.
Please Piratis please stop cutting and pasting old posts, any chance you can post some new material?
Piratis wroteQuote:
They do have to be registered as being on the island in 1974 unless the property is part of the deceased owners estate. Which is proposterous as many TC's were "encouraged" to leave Cyprus in the 60's
Where is your source about the crap you are saying?
Quote:
Piratis your silence in answering your original post was deafening.
I answered already. Sorry for not wasting more time with answering to things that exist only in your imagination.
Piratis your good at scourcing information, you check out the property laws of the ROC regards restitution of TC property and prove me wrong. I find it strange that you are not questioning my original post re TC's living on the island pre 1974. As you well know through the Cyprus history TC's were encouraged to leave between the 60's and 74. Remember Enosis?