The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Did America plan 9/11

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Did America plan 9/11

Postby rawk » Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:09 pm

I've just watched this video documentary, do you think its true or some just some clever conspiracy theory, I'm undecided.

http://www.loosechange911.com/

Rawk
User avatar
rawk
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Larnaca on Sea, Cyprus

Postby Piratis » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:27 am

I don't know what was behind 9/11.

However what is obvious is that after the collapse of the USSR the Americans needed to create a new enemy that would allow them to continue with their massive military investment, that will give them an excuse to continue having the "need" for several military bases around the world, and that would allow them to expand their dominence over the world.

The only ones who benefit from the "war on terror" are the American (and friends) capitalists.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby anastasiaC » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:58 am

Who knows?? consipracy theories are out there - I dont know.......what I do know is the middle east is one huge mess right now and the world is following suit..........
the US invaded Iraq on false terms, most of the supposedly suicide pilots of 9/11 were Saudi arabians
but the US being close allies to Saudi Arabia seem to be OK with this.........
anastasiaC
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:20 am

Postby GG » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:20 am

Well explosives experts all over the world are insisting that the way the tower collapsed evenly on itself meant that there were evenly placed explosives inside the building.

To be honest it all makes sense.

And then there is the issue that nobody saw any damage to the pentagon, no witnesses, no injuries etc. Its all too convenient.
User avatar
GG
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:16 pm

Postby Kikapu » Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:31 am

GG wrote:Well explosives experts all over the world are insisting that the way the tower collapsed evenly on itself meant that there were evenly placed explosives inside the building.

To be honest it all makes sense.

And then there is the issue that nobody saw any damage to the pentagon, no witnesses, no injuries etc. Its all too convenient.


As much as I don't trust Bush, non of the above is correct. That's not to say, they did not have prior knowlege of the hijackers or some of their plans. I think they (Bush) really thought it would be , as Rice said, that, it would be just another hijacking incident, maybe even shoot the planes down to create a strong case to go to war against Iraq. Read "PNAC" and see who wrote it and why.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby miltiades » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:04 pm

I have read a lot of rubbish in my life but never such garbage as GG writes. Look for fs sake , we saw two f..ng planes crush on the tower , are you stupid or what.
As for Piratis , I do hope that our government does not even share one iota of his ideas on America.
The anti American lobby is continuing with the usual crap , americanico daxtilo here we go again.
Tell you what Piratis , why don't you petition our government to offer Al Qaeda sanctuary in Cyprus , and offer Bin Laden the highest honour that Cyprus can offer , and perhaps join the Arab league . that will teach the bastard Americans a lesson !
I think it is a total disgrace that so many Cypriots are undermining international efforts by Cypriots dedicated to the unification of our island by the constant barrage of Anti American views , not even stopping to think that only America stops the world from recognising the permanent partition of our island. Should we fail and the US recognises"TRNC " , that my Piratis is the end of your dream and the dream of all genuine Cypriots.
Will you ever understand this.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby GG » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:40 pm

miltiades wrote:I have read a lot of rubbish in my life but never such garbage as GG writes. Look for fs sake , we saw two f..ng planes crush on the tower , are you stupid or what.


Nobody is denying what we saw with the 2 planes.
The theory is that it was planned and not that it was an illusion.
Any engineer that has seen the footage cannot explain how all 4 corners of a tower would give way at the same time and make the tower collapse down on itself, the norm is one side to collapse. Their only explanation is timed explosives. I am not an expert but when the engineers and explosives experts explained it, it did make some sense. Is there a real need to call me stupid?

The real answer is nobody knows. And we probably never will.
User avatar
GG
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:16 pm

Postby Sotos » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:50 pm

I don't think they would dare to blow up their own buildings! What if evidence of such plot were revealed? Nobody would risk it!
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Postby miltiades » Wed Aug 02, 2006 1:55 pm

""Any engineer that has seen the footage cannot explain how all 4 corners of a tower would give way at the same time and make the tower collapse down on itself, the norm is one side to collapse. Their only explanation is timed explosives. I am not an expert but when the engineers and explosives experts explained it, it did make some sense. Is there a real need to call me stupid? ""

WHICH ENGINEER ?
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby GG » Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:33 pm

miltiades wrote:WHICH ENGINEER ?




http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

These are not only engineers, but also professors. Maybe they are also stupid?

Also why have the US government not given a reason as to why they cannot reveal the findings of why liquid metal was found at the wreckage. This is liquid metal that is associated with a type of charge that is used to melt metal (building structure) when set off.

Some metal at the wreckage was still hot after 6 weeks and that can only be explained by the use of these metal chemical melting explosives. I am not saying thats its 100% what happened but I do definitely think something is not being revealed.



If you read this http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/ene ... Jones1.pdf and then watch this http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... net+9%2F11 I think you might agree that it makes some sense. Random fires halfway down the tower and on the corner supports and dust clouds matching those of demolition, its all to coincidental for me.

User avatar
GG
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:16 pm

Next

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests