Cyprus-Forum.com

[stuballstu]

There are some un answered questions relating to the 9/11 attrocitied. Has anyone watched Micheal Moores documentery/film Farenheight 911. If not i suggest you do a bit of an eye opener.

Also there was something about Amerca, many years ago, were going to sink there biggest Aircraft Carrier in the Carribean, and blame Cuba to give them an excuse to invade ( Sound fimiliar to Afghanistan?) It was documents which were released under the freedom of information act after de classification as they dated more than 30 years.

Do a google search and input "911 conspiracy theories" makes some interesting reading.

[Mickleham]

Yes.

Anything is possible from these americans

Divide and rule

[Kikapu]

WHICH ENGINEER ?

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

These are not only engineers, but also professors. Maybe they are also stupid?

Also why have the US government not given a reason as to why they cannot reveal the findings of why liquid metal was found at the wreckage. This is liquid metal that is associated with a type of charge that is used to melt metal (building structure) when set off.

Some metal at the wreckage was still hot after 6 weeks and that can only be explained by the use of these metal chemical melting explosives. I am not saying thats its 100% what happened but I do definitely think something is not being revealed.



If you read this http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/ene ... Jones1.pdf and then watch this http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... net+9%2F11 I think you might agree that it makes some sense. Random fires halfway down the tower and on the corner supports and dust clouds matching those of demolition, its all to coincidental for me.

GG,

Forget all these nonsense. If it's the heat and molten metal that's been bothering you, there was a plane with full tank of fuel, and the force of the impact was enough to tear the steel structure, followed by extreme high heat from the fuel, to melt down the steel. Once the steel structures became weak, with the tons of weight from the above 30-40 floors, it created a pancake collapse effect, one floor at a time, only almost at the speed of gravity. It was a chain reaction. If you had noticed, the second tower that was hit, collapsed first, because the impact point was lower than the first tower, and also, the impact point was more to one side than dead in the middle of the impact area. With the extra floors above, and a weakend corner structure of the second tower that was hit, lead to it to collapse first. Now, I'm not an engineer or a professor, but have enough common sense to see what had happened.

[miltiades]

Usual crap with conspiracy theories , some one writes a book , makes a film and the money rolls in and the coffee shops are bustling with conspiracy aficionados discussing and blaming America for all of the worlds evils.
An aircraft travelling at more than 400 miles an hour weighing hundreds of tons and loaded with thousand of gallons of highly inflammable fuel crashes on the Towers and some genius is trying to establish if dynamite was used in order to bring the towers down. Well some time ago I proved that pigs fly !

[Biker]

Well some time ago I proved that pigs fly !

That's it, 4 flying suicide pigs with timers hit the corners simultaneously.

Of course the question now is if Osama would have allowed pigs to be Muslims, long enough for them to make the attack???

Perhaps they were goats dressed as pigs??? Oh NO, not another well researched conspiracy theory...

[Natty]

Oh, I don't know whether it was planned by the US......

[Natty]

Too many people died.....

[anastasiaC]

u can expect anything from America - didnt they say
the footage of the first men that landed on the moon (1969) was
done in a hollywood studio LOL

who knows??..........

I did watch michael moore's docutmentaries - makes you think although his editing is pretty spectacular but I admire the guy for standing up and making people think and speak out.........

www.michaelmoore.com

[Damsi]

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Allegations Brought to Inspectors General

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006; Page A03

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.

Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01300.html

Was 9/11 an 'inside job'?

By THOMAS HARGROVE AND GUIDO H. STEMPEL III
SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/ ... ource=mypi