Kikapu wrote:Kifeas wrote:miltiades wrote:Viewpoint , get a hold of your self , you are exaggerating again , how many thousands of Turkish troops died ???
YOU WROTE:
""it is at this point that thousands of Turkish soldiers died and you expect them not retaliate with even greater force, it was all out war the moment you ""
You tend to over estimate the capabilities of the G/Cs to inflict harm on the Turkish army.
YOU USE THE SAME ANALOGY WHEN DEALING WITH WHAT YOU CALL THE "CLEANSING " OF T/Cs
It's called propaganda , its unsubstantiated figures from the top of your head , that really is not necessary.
I think from the top of my head the number of Turkish troops that were killed was no more than a few hundred if that , but as I said I'm using the same criteria as you do , the top of my head.
Miltiades, I do not know what you have in mind but even though the GCs were fighting with WWI “type A” (“martini”) rifles and some bazookas and Brens, Turkish troops indeed have had severe losses. On the landing place and until the fall of Kyrenia (3 days after the invasion begun,) they definitely lost more than 500 troops and officers, and in the 5 day long fighting to occupy Lapithos and Karavas villages during the cease-fire period (31/7 -5/8 ) and which I have lived through until we evacuated Lapithos on the evening of the 4/08, they lost at least another 400 - 500 and about 6 tanks. On the capturing by LOK units of the Kocha Kayia hills opposite St. Hilarion (overlooking Agirda village) and the Petromouthkia hill overlooking the Kyrenia/Nicosia passage, during the night of 20/21 of July, reports say that at least 1-2 companies of parachutists (marines) have vanished. The Turks never publicly revealed their losses in 1974, but it is estimated that that they were in the range 2,000 –in fact approximately as many as the GC NG had lost.
I have just managed to catch up on all your conversations. Viewpoint claims few thousand Turkish soldiers dead, while Miltiades claims "rubbish", and stated only hundreds, (corrected it tonight to mean 10th of hundreds, which means few thousands), and Kifeas also claiming to be in few thousands, but I noticed the touch of exploitation of his own remarks, regarding the deaths of the Turkish troops. I can only think, this was intended to show that a small Greek and GCNG with 1st World War weaponary were able to fight courageously to defend Cyprus and it's citizens from an invading foreign forces, but at the end, they were defeated by a much larger and stronger army, but not before killing thousands of them in the meantime.
If Turkey lost between 2,000 and 3,000 troops in less than few days, how big was the Greek forces on the other side. It sounds to me to be more than the 1,000 mainland legal Greek force that was stationed in Cyprus, and even the 1200 Greek Cypriot national guards, could do so much damage to the Turkish forces. Perhaps we should also add the 10,000 illegal millitia force that Makarios put together in 1960's that was run by his friend Grivas, which was hidden from the TC's. That still only adds up to around 12,000. Just to make a comparison, when the USA and UK invaded Iraq with 150,000 troops, and first fought the Iraqi army, then the rag tag insurgents, with their hit and run fighting, and after 3 years with an on going deaths to the US and UK forces, the total is less than 3,000. How can this be. Turkey loses 2,000 to 3,000 in a few days and the US and UK about the same amount in 3 years. If Kifeas did not confirm these Turkish troop deaths, I would have called Viewpoint a lier also, just as Miltiades did at first.
So what is my conclusion from all these. Well, there had to be a lot more mainland and local forces that fought the Turkish troops. And I have to say, thank God that the Turks were not defeated by this large and well equiped with heavy weapons form the Greek side, because, once Turkey pulled back with it's tail between it's legs, it was going to be "turkey shoot" for the rest of the Turkish Cypriots. I now believe, that the "coup" was well organized to 1st to defeat an invading force from Turkey as the guarantor, and than finish of the TC's. It would have been a perfect set up, to claim that the TC's just got caught and killed between the two forces, and had Turkey did not try to invade, all this would have been avoided. Then of course, the Enosis would have been established within few days.
The more I read of the past, the more problems I see for the future. Turkey will have a hard time walking away from Cyprus, if in fact they lost up to 3,000 troops there. And at the same time, TC's will have a hard time trusting their GC's for the future, knowing they came within a whisker of being wiped out. This is not to say that the average GC is responsible as to what has and almost had happened to the TC's, but at the same time, had Enosis went ahead, they would not be looking back today, wishing that it never happened. So the future is very uncertain both to the TC's and the GC's.